Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Resolution of tissue signatures of therapy response in patients with recurrent GBM treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD1
Yue Lu1, Alphonsus H C Ng1, Frances E Chow2
1Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract:
The response of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade has been challenging to interpret due to the inter-patient and intra-tumor heterogeneity. We report on a comparative analysis of tumor tissues collected from patients with recurrent glioblastoma and high-risk melanoma, both treated with neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade. We develop a framework that uses multiplex spatial protein profiling, machine learning-based image analysis, and data-driven computational models to investigate the pathophysiological and molecular factors within the tumor microenvironment that influence treatment response. Using melanoma to guide the interpretation of glioblastoma analyses, we interrogate the protein expression in microscopic compartments of tumors, and determine the correlates of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, tumor growth, treatment response, and immune cell-cell interaction. This work reveals similarities shared between glioblastoma and melanoma, immunosuppressive factors that are unique to the glioblastoma microenvironment, and potential co-targets for enhancing the efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade.
Insights
Interpreting patient responses to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is complex. This study compares GBM and melanoma, revealing shared and unique tumor microenvironment factors to improve treatment efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Interpreting patient responses to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is challenging due to significant patient and tumor heterogeneity.
- Comparative analysis between GBM and high-risk melanoma treated with ICB offers a potential framework for understanding treatment response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a framework integrating multiplex spatial protein profiling, machine learning image analysis, and computational modeling.
- To investigate pathophysiological and molecular factors within the tumor microenvironment influencing ICB response in GBM and melanoma.
- To identify similarities and differences in the tumor microenvironment between GBM and melanoma to guide GBM treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Multiplex spatial protein profiling of tumor tissues from patients with recurrent GBM and high-risk melanoma.
- Machine learning-based image analysis to interrogate protein expression in microscopic tumor compartments.
- Data-driven computational models to analyze immune cell-cell interactions and treatment response correlates.
Main Results:
- Identified shared pathophysiological and molecular factors influencing ICB response in both GBM and melanoma.
- Revealed immunosuppressive factors unique to the GBM microenvironment.
- Established correlates of cytotoxic CD8+ T cell infiltration, tumor growth, and treatment response.
Conclusions:
- Melanoma serves as a valuable model for interpreting complex GBM immune responses to ICB.
- The GBM microenvironment presents unique immunosuppressive challenges distinct from melanoma.
- Identified potential co-targets for enhancing neoadjuvant ICB efficacy in glioblastoma.
More Related Videos
11:15Stereotactic Adoptive Transfer of Cytotoxic Immune Cells in Murine Models of Orthotopic Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
Published on: September 1, 2018
06:32Evaluation of Biomarkers in Glioma by Immunohistochemistry on Paraffin-Embedded 3D Glioma Neurosphere Cultures
Published on: January 9, 2019