Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

04:01
The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025
136
Kinematic analysis of two scapholunate ligament reconstruction techniques
Seungbum Chae1, Junho Nam1, Il-Jung Park2
1Department Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, College of Medicine, 58931The Daegu Catholic University of Korea, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong)
|June 30, 2021
Summary
Both modified Brunelli technique (MBT) and Mark Henry's technique (MHT) restore the dorsal scapholunate interval after ligament reconstruction. No significant differences were found between these two surgical methods in cadaveric wrist models.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomechanics
- Hand Surgery
Background:
- Scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injuries can lead to wrist instability.
- Surgical reconstruction aims to restore normal wrist kinematics.
- The modified Brunelli technique (MBT) and Mark Henry's technique (MHT) are two common SLIL reconstruction methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the kinematic effects of MBT and MHT for SLIL reconstruction.
- To evaluate the restoration of scapholunate (SL) and radiolunate (RL) angles and intervals after each procedure.
Main Methods:
- Ten cadaveric wrists were analyzed.
- Kinematic data (SL interval, SL angle, RL angle) were collected using a MicroScribe system.
- Measurements were taken in neutral, flexion, extension, and clenched fist positions under five conditions: intact, volar SLIL resection, whole SLIL resection, MBT reconstruction, and MHT reconstruction.
Main Results:
- Whole SLIL resection widened dorsal SL intervals, SL angle, and RL angle.
- Both MBT and MHT successfully restored dorsal SL intervals in all positions.
- Neither MBT nor MHT fully restored the volar SL interval, SL angle, or RL angle in specific positions.
Conclusions:
- MBT and MHT effectively restore the dorsal SL interval in cadaveric models.
- No significant kinematic differences were observed between MBT and MHT in this study.
- MBT may offer advantages in operative efficiency and reduced anterior structure injury compared to MHT.
