Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2025

09:09
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
629
Consistency Improvement With a Feedback Recommendation in Personalized Linguistic Group Decision Making
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
|June 30, 2021
Summary
This study introduces a new method to improve linguistic decision-making consistency by considering personalized individual semantics (PISs). It accounts for how different people interpret words, leading to more accurate group decisions.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Linguistics
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Linguistic decision making relies on consistency measures.
- Current methods overlook personalized individual semantics (PISs), where word meanings vary among decision-makers.
- This omission impacts the accuracy of group decision-making outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel approach for improving consistency in linguistic group decision making.
- To integrate personalized individual semantics (PISs) into consistency measurement and improvement.
- To address the limitations of existing methods that ignore semantic variations.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel consistency improving approach for linguistic group decision making.
- Incorporated personalized representation characteristics.
- Integrated a PIS-based model for measuring and enhancing linguistic preference relations.
Main Results:
- The proposed approach effectively measures and improves consistency in linguistic preference relations.
- Demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness through detailed numerical and comparative analyses.
- Showcased the importance of considering PISs for accurate decision making.
Conclusions:
- The novel approach enhances linguistic decision-making consistency by incorporating personalized individual semantics (PISs).
- This method offers a more realistic and accurate way to handle linguistic preferences in group settings.
- Future research can build upon this PIS-based model for more robust decision support systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
30.0K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
30.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method
6.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.0K
In- and Out-Groups
41.4K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
41.4K
Confirmation Biases
7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.5K
Groupthink
46.8K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
46.8K

