Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

47
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
47
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

251
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
251
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

43
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
43
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

368
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
368
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.4K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) including <i>Candidozyma auris</i> among residents in ventilator-designated versus non-ventilator-designated beds at skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients With Cancer Hospitalized With Infection: Secondary Analysis of the INSPIRE Cluster Randomized Trials.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Sequential Safety Surveillance of RSVpreF Vaccination During Pregnancy Early in the Postapproval Period.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Postmarketing safety surveillance for GSK's AS01<sub>E</sub>-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in the USA: protocol for a non-interventional postauthorisation safety study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Interim Safety of RSVpreF Vaccination During Pregnancy.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Can chlorhexidine bathing reduce Candidozyma auris shedding?

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 31, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K

Matching in cluster randomized trials using the Goldilocks Approach.

S Gwynn Sturdevant1, Susan S Huang2, Richard Platt3

  • 1Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard, 175 N. Harvard Street, Suite 1350, Boston, MA, 02134, USA.

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
|July 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel matching strategy for group-randomized trials (GRTs) to enhance covariate balance. The method iteratively pairs clusters to minimize distance, aiding researchers in selecting optimal randomizations for improved study design.

Keywords:
Baseline covariatesMatchingRandomizationRandomized trials

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 31, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Covariate balance is crucial in group or cluster-randomized trials (GRTs) for reducing bias.
  • Traditional matching methods may not adequately address balance across numerous confounding variables in GRTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an innovative strategy for improving covariate balance in GRTs using baseline data.
  • To provide a systematic approach for matching clusters to minimize confounding variables.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed strategy iteratively pairs clusters by minimizing Mahalanobis distance.
  • It involves visual assessment of potential randomization effects using parallel-coordinates plots.
  • Variable reweighting is employed to optimize cluster pairing for enhanced balance.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated application of the matching strategy using the Mupirocin-Iodophor Swap Out trial.
  • The method allows for visual comparison of different weighting schemes to aid randomization decisions.
  • A user-friendly web application is provided to facilitate the implementation of this strategy.

Conclusions:

  • The presented matching strategy offers a robust method for achieving covariate balance in GRTs.
  • This approach empowers researchers to make informed decisions regarding randomization prior to trial initiation.
  • The accompanying webapp enhances the practical utility and accessibility of this advanced statistical technique.