Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual reaction-time versus action-time.

F W Campbell1, J M Artigas, A Felipe

  • 1Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Order-restricted Dose-related Trend Phi-divergence Tests for Generalized Linear Models.

Journal of applied statistics·2024
Same author

Chromatic and achromatic visual fields in relation to choroidal thickness in patients with high myopia: A pilot study.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2018
Same author

Comparative histomorphological study of endometrium in mares.

Anatomia, histologia, embryologia·2018
Same author

Pediatric Klüver-Bucy Syndrome: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

Neuropediatrics·2017
Same author

Photoprotection and photoreception of intraocular lenses under xenon and white LED illumination.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2016
Same author

Minimum ϕ -Divergence Estimation in Constrained Latent Class Models for Binary Data.

Psychometrika·2015
Same journal

Mesopic Illumination in Natural Environments: Implications for Myopia Research.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Axial Length Growth Reference Curves and LMS Parameters for Japanese Children and Adolescents Aged 4-20 Years: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Effect of Switching Myopia Control Strategies on Axial Elongation in Children with Poor Response to Highly Aspherical Lenslet Therapy.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Role of Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration and Age in Night Vision Disturbances.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Impaired Rod-Mediated Vision is the Functional Hallmark of Ageing and Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same journal

Analytical Performance, Spatial Dynamics and Clinically Meaningful Change Thresholds for Automated Non-invasive Tear Film Assessment Using the Oculus Keratograph 5M.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
See all related articles

Human reaction time for movement is approximately 150 ms. Action time to avoid or maximize collision with moving lines was significantly faster, about one-third of reaction time.

Area of Science:

  • Human motor control
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Perception-action coupling

Background:

  • Understanding human reaction time is crucial for designing effective human-computer interfaces and safety systems.
  • Collision avoidance and trajectory prediction are complex cognitive tasks.
  • Previous research has established baseline human reaction times for simple movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare human reaction-time for movement with the time required to take action in a dynamic collision scenario.
  • To investigate the efficiency of human decision-making and motor control under threat of collision.
  • To quantify the difference between simple reaction-time and complex action-time in a visually guided task.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task involving two moving lines on a collision course.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects were instructed to either avoid or maximize the collision.
  • Reaction-time and action-time were measured and compared.

    • Main Results:

    • The baseline reaction-time for movement was measured at approximately 150 ms.
    • The time required to take action to avoid or maximize collision was significantly shorter than the baseline reaction-time.
    • Action-time was found to be approximately one-third of the reaction-time.

    Conclusions:

    • Humans can react and execute complex actions significantly faster than simple reaction-time suggests when anticipating dynamic events.
    • The perception-action system is highly efficient in predicting and responding to potential collisions.
    • Training can enhance the speed and accuracy of collision avoidance or maximization behaviors.