Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing 3D Cytoarchitecture Analysis - Rapid Volumetric Reconstruction of the Human Brain
Published on: January 26, 2024
Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI
Nobuo Kashiwagi1, Hisashi Tanaka2, Yuichi Yamashita3
1Department of Future Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Background:
Several deep learning-based methods have been proposed for addressing the long scanning time of magnetic resonance imaging. Most are trained using brain 3T magnetic resonance images, but is unclear whether performance is affected when applying these methods to different anatomical sites and at different field strengths.
Purpose:
To validate the denoising performance of deep learning-based reconstruction method trained by brain and knee 3T magnetic resonance images when applied to lumbar 1.5T magnetic resonance images.
Material And Methods:
Using a 1.5T scanner, we obtained lumber T2-weighted sequences in 10 volunteers using three different scanning times: 228 s (standard), 119 s (double-fast), and 68 s (triple-fast). We compared the images obtained by the standard sequence with those obtained by the deep learning-based reconstruction-applied faster sequences.
Results:
Signal-to-noise ratio values were significantly higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast than for standard and did not differ significantly between deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast and standard. Contrast-to-noise ratio values also did not differ significantly between deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast and standard. Qualitative scores for perceived signal-to-noise ratio and overall image quality were significantly higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard. Average scores for sharpness, contrast, and structure visibility were equal to or higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard, but the differences were not statistically significant. The average scores for artifact were lower for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion:
The deep learning-based reconstruction method trained by 3T brain and knee images may reduce the scanning time of 1.5T lumbar magnetic resonance images by one-third without sacrificing image quality.
