Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.4K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.4K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

341
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
341
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

278
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
278
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

418
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
418
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.6K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.6K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

366
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
366

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discussion on 'Causal inference with misspecified network interference structure' by Bar Weinstein and Daniel Nevo.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Summarising multiple bounds of the average causal effect in Mendelian randomisation.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2023
Same author

Discussion on "Instrumented difference-in-differences" by Ting Ye, Ashkan Ertefaie, James Flory, Sean Hennessy & Dylan S. Small.

Biometrics·2022
Same author

Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.

Biometrics·2021
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.

Sheng Wang1, Hyunseung Kang1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Biometrics
|July 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new statistical tests for Mendelian randomization (MR) that are robust to weak instruments, improving accuracy in genetic epidemiology research.

Keywords:
Mendelian randomizationinstrumental variablestwo-sample summary-data Mendelian randomizationweak-instrument asymptotics

More Related Videos

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.4K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.4K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) is widely used to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IV).
  • Two-sample summary-data MR is particularly popular but susceptible to bias and inflated Type I errors when instruments are weakly associated with the exposure.
  • Weak instrument bias is a significant challenge in genetic epidemiology, potentially leading to unreliable causal effect estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel statistical test statistics for two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization that are robust under weak-instrument asymptotics.
  • To extend established econometric tests, including the Anderson-Rubin, Kleibergen, and conditional likelihood ratio tests, to the MR context.
  • To provide a robust point estimator and a method for detecting invalid instruments based on the proposed Anderson-Rubin test.

Main Methods:

  • Extension of Anderson-Rubin, Kleibergen, and conditional likelihood ratio tests from econometrics to two-sample summary-data MR.
  • Development of a point estimator using the proposed Anderson-Rubin test.
  • Creation of a method for invalid instrument detection.
  • Validation through simulation studies and an empirical analysis.

Main Results:

  • The proposed test statistics demonstrate robustness under weak-instrument asymptotics in Mendelian randomization.
  • The new methods effectively control Type I errors and mitigate bias associated with weak instruments.
  • The Anderson-Rubin test provides a reliable point estimator and aids in identifying invalid instruments.
  • Simulations and empirical results show improved power compared to existing methods when dealing with weak instruments.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical tests offer a more reliable approach to Mendelian randomization analysis, particularly in the presence of weak instruments.
  • These robust methods enhance the accuracy and validity of causal inference in genetic epidemiology.
  • The findings suggest that the proposed extensions provide superior performance over existing techniques for Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments.