Related Experiment Videos
How to inject ictal SPECT? From manual to automated injection
Xavier Setoain1, Francisco Campos2, Antonio Donaire3
1Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Successful surgery depends on the accurate localization of epileptogenic zone before surgery. Ictal SPECT is the only imaging modality that allows identification of the ictal onset zone by measuring the regional cerebral blood flow at the time of injection. The main limitation of ictal SPECT in epilepsy is the complex methodology of the tracer injection during a seizure. To overcome this limitation, we present the main features of the first automated injector for ictal SPECT (epijet, LemerPax; La Chapelle -sur-Erdre; France). In this study we compared traditional manual injection with automated injection for ictal SPECT in 122 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Methods:
The study included 55 consecutive prospective patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing injection with the automated injector. The control group was our retrospective database of a historic pool of 67 patients, injected manually from 2014 to 2016. Calculated annual exposure/radioactive dose for operators was measured. Injection time, seizure focus localization with ictal SPECT, as well as repeated hospitalizations related to inconclusive findings of the SPECT were compared in these two groups of patients.
Results:
There were no differences in the average injection time with epijet (13 s) compared with the traditional manual injection (14 s). The seizure focus was successfully localized with ictal SPECT with epijet in 44/55 (80 %) patients and with manual injection in 46/67 (68 %) patients (p = 0.097). Repeated studies were required in 9/67 (23 %) patients in the manual injection group compared to 3 patients (7%) in the epijet group (p = 0.141). Calculated annual exposure/dose for operators of 0.39 mSv/year and administered dose error inferior to 5% are other advantages of epijet.
Conclusion:
The first results using epijet are promising in adjustment of the injection dose, reducing the rate of radiation exposure for patients and nurses, maintaining the same injection time and allowing high SPECT accuracy. These preliminary results support the use of an automated injection system to inject radioactive ictal SPECT doses in epilepsy units.