Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2025

07:16
Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
34.8K
Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter retrospective study
Ying Wei1, Cheng-Zhong Peng2, Shu-Rong Wang3
1Department of Interventional Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Summary
Microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offer comparable safety and effectiveness for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Both minimally invasive techniques demonstrate similar cure rates and complication profiles in patients with pHPT.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is a common endocrine disorder often requiring intervention.
- Minimally invasive ablation techniques, including microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), have emerged as treatment options for pHPT.
- Comparative data on the long-term clinical outcomes of MWA versus RFA in pHPT management are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT).
- To evaluate key outcomes including ablation cure, clinical cure, recurrence, persistence, and complication rates between MWA and RFA groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 104 patients with pHPT treated with either MWA or RFA across four centers (January 2015 - March 2020).
- Clinical outcomes assessed included effectiveness (defined by serum calcium and intact parathyroid hormone levels) and complication rates.
- Follow-up duration varied, with a median of 18.7 months for MWA and 12 months for RFA.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in ablation cure rates (88.3% MWA vs. 88.9% RFA) or clinical cure rates (87.0% MWA vs. 82.3% RFA).
- Recurrence and persistent pHPT rates were comparable between MWA and RFA groups (5.2% vs. 3.7% for recurrence; 11.7% vs. 11.1% for persistence).
- Complication rates were similar (9.1% MWA vs. 3.7% RFA), with voice change noted as a major complication in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are safe and effective treatment modalities for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT).
- The study found comparable clinical outcomes, including cure rates and complication profiles, between MWA and RFA.
- Tumor size (maximum diameter < 0.7 cm) was identified as an independent predictor of successful ablation in pHPT.
Keywords:
Microwave radiationhypocalcemiaparathyroid hormoneprimary hyperparathyroidismradiofrequency therapy
