Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2025

14:40
Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings
Published on: October 25, 2015
9.6K
Delayed cord clamping: Time for physiologic implementation
Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
|July 5, 2021
Summary
Delayed cord clamping offers benefits for preterm and term infants, but practices vary. Cord milking may pose risks for preterm babies, highlighting the need for standardized delayed clamping protocols.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal medicine
- Perinatal care
- Obstetrics
Background:
- Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recognized for its benefits in both preterm and term neonates.
- Current clinical guidelines for DCC lack consistency across institutions, leading to non-standardized practices.
- Physiologic-based cord clamping (PBCC) has been introduced as an alternative approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the benefits and variations in delayed cord clamping practices.
- To compare the physiological effects of DCC and cord milking.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of different cord management techniques in neonates, particularly preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on delayed cord clamping and cord milking.
- Analysis of physiological effects and clinical outcomes associated with each method.
- Comparison of existing practice guidelines and their standardization.
Main Results:
- Delayed cord clamping demonstrates benefits for both preterm and term infants.
- Significant variability exists in the implementation and standardization of DCC protocols.
- Cord milking presents distinct physiological effects that may be detrimental to preterm infants.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of delayed cord clamping is crucial for optimizing neonatal outcomes.
- Physiologic-based cord clamping requires further investigation, especially regarding cord milking's safety in preterm neonates.
- Consistent guidelines are needed to ensure the safe and effective application of cord management techniques.

