Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations01:08

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

1.4K
Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...
1.4K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

563
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
563
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

702
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
702
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

4.9K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
4.9K
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

4.1K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
4.1K
Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

49.7K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
49.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responses to dichotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2022
Same author

Level differences impact the fusion of concurrent vowels dissimilarly within versus across ears.

JASA express letters·2022
Same author

Responses to diotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus: stimulus envelope and neural fluctuation cues.

Hearing research·2021
Same author

Challenging One Model With Many Stimuli: Simulating Responses in the Inferior Colliculus.

Acta acustica united with acustica : the journal of the European Acoustics Association (EEIG)·2020
Same author

Both Val158Met Polymorphism of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Gene and Menstrual Cycle Affect Prepulse Inhibition but Not Attentional Modulation of Prepulse Inhibition in Younger-Adult Females.

Neuroscience·2019
Same author

The pathogenic and vaccine strains of equine infectious anemia virus differentially induce cytokine and chemokine expression and apoptosis in macrophages.

Virus research·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

12.9K

Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises.

Langchen Fan1,2, Lingzhi Kong3, Liang Li1,2

  • 1Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Frontiers in Psychology
|July 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human listeners can detect a break in interaural correlation (BIAC) in both steady and gliding noise. However, detecting BIACs in frequency-gliding noise requires longer durations and shorter delays, indicating lower sensitivity.

Keywords:
auditory systembinaural hearingcenter frequencyfrequency glidinginteraural correlationinteraural delay

More Related Videos

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

12.2K
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

12.9K
Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

12.2K
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.3K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Detection Theory

Background:

  • Binaural hearing relies on interaural correlation for sound localization and spatial awareness.
  • Detecting changes in binaural correlation, known as a break in interaural correlation (BIAC), is crucial for auditory scene analysis.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on BIAC detection in steady-state noise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human listeners' ability to detect a break in interaural correlation (BIAC) within frequency-gliding noise.
  • To compare the detection thresholds of BIACs in frequency-gliding noise versus frequency-steady noise.
  • To assess the influence of frequency modulation on the sensitivity to binaural decorrelation.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved participants with normal hearing detecting embedded BIACs in either frequency-constant or frequency-gliding noise.
  • Two experiments varied noise types (up-gliding, down-gliding, frequency-steady) and measured duration thresholds and interaural delay limits.
  • Participant groups varied across experiments, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 39 individuals.

Main Results:

  • Listeners successfully detected BIACs in both frequency-steady and frequency-gliding noise conditions.
  • The duration threshold for BIAC detection was significantly longer in frequency-gliding noises compared to frequency-steady noise.
  • The maximum detectable interaural delay for a fixed-duration BIAC was significantly shorter in frequency-gliding noises.

Conclusions:

  • Human listeners can perceive breaks in binaural correlation even when the noise is frequency-modulated.
  • Sensitivity to BIACs is significantly reduced in frequency-gliding noise compared to frequency-steady noise.
  • Frequency modulation poses a challenge for binaural processing, impacting the detection of subtle changes in interaural correlation.