Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...

Brain Imaging

Brain Imaging

Brain imaging technologies provide critical insights into both the structure and function of the human brain, enabling medical professionals and researchers to diagnose, study, and treat neurological disorders or psychiatric disorders more effectively.
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Behavioural separation of face memory and face perception.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Spectral and non-spectral EEG measures in the prediction of working memory task performance and psychopathology.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A measure of reliability convergence to select and optimize cognitive tasks for individual differences research.

Communications psychology·2024

Same author

Behavioral representational similarity analysis reveals how episodic learning is influenced by and reshapes semantic memory.

Nature communications·2023

Same author

Enhancing learning and retention with distinctive virtual reality environments and mental context reinstatement.

NPJ science of learning·2022

Same author

Dissociating neural markers of stimulus memorability and subjective recognition during episodic retrieval.

Scientific reports·2018

Same journal

Chat M.D.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

Same journal

Regulating genetic discrimination in Chinese employment: insights from thalassemia-related cases.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

Same journal

Still invisible? Legal and ethical treatment of intersex individuals in China.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

Same journal

The SNP consortium: background and context.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

Same journal

Two-faced Janus? Consent to participate in research and consent to data processing in the EHDS era: a comparative analysis of requirements and standards in eight European countries.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

Same journal

Mind, machine, and the law: reimagining neurotechnology governance through disability rights.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Evidence of memory from brain data.

Emily R D Murphy¹, Jesse Rissman²

¹University of California Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94131.

Journal of Law and the Biosciences

|July 5, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Brain-based memory detection faces limitations due to biological constraints, not technology. Current science suggests courtroom admissibility is premature, urging focus on understanding memory

Keywords:

brain court evidence fMRI machine learning memory detection

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Published on: August 26, 2011

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection

Published on: August 26, 2011

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology
Forensic Science

Background:

Courtroom evidence frequently depends on witness memory assessment.
Advances in brain imaging and machine learning offer new insights into autobiographical memory.
This creates potential for brain-based memory detection technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the conceptual foundation of brain-based memory detection as evidence.
To review the current state of brain-based memory detection research.
To establish a framework for the admissibility of such evidence in court and assess its alignment with justice.

Main Methods:

Review of scientific literature on brain imaging analysis techniques for memory.
Analysis of machine learning algorithm capabilities in memory detection.
Interdisciplinary examination of legal admissibility frameworks and ethical considerations.

Main Results:

Powerful machine learning algorithms reveal limitations in technological capacity for true memory detection.
Existing psychological understanding that memory is inherently flawed is reinforced.
Biological constraints, rather than technological ones, limit accurate memory detection.

Conclusions:

Courtroom admissibility of brain-based memory detection is currently a misdirected pursuit.
Understanding the biological limitations of memory is crucial for legal assessments.
Further research into the biology of human memory holds significant value.