Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

2.6K
Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
2.6K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

55.9K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
55.9K
Introduction to Special Senses01:26

Introduction to Special Senses

6.4K
Sensory receptors play an integral part in comprehending our external and internal environments. They receive diverse stimuli, converting them into the nervous system's electrochemical signals. This conversion occurs as the stimulus alters the sensory neuron's cell membrane potential, instigating the generation of an action potential. This action potential is subsequently transmitted to the central nervous system (CNS), which integrates with other sensory data or higher cognitive...
6.4K
Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

41.2K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
41.2K
Sensation01:21

Sensation

934
Sensory receptors are specialized neurons that respond to specific types of external stimuli, initiating the process known as sensation. This occurs when sensory input, such as light entering the eye, is detected by these receptors, causing chemical changes in the cells of the retina. These cells then convert the sensory stimulus into action potentials that are transmitted to the central nervous system, a process termed transduction.
Absolute thresholds can quantify the sensitivity of sensory...
934
Major Somatic Sensory Pathways01:28

Major Somatic Sensory Pathways

1.5K
Sensory impulses related to touch, pressure, vibration, and proprioception from various body parts, such as the limbs, trunk, neck, and posterior head, travel to the cerebral cortex through the posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway. The pathway’s name derives from the two white-matter tracts that convey the impulses: the spinal cord's posterior column and the brainstem's medial lemniscus. First-order sensory neurons extend their axons into the spinal cord, forming the...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of retrocalcaneal bursal effusion on the mechanical behavior of the Achilles tendon insertion during ankle dorsiflexion: a cadaveric study.

Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA·2026
Same author

Unmyelinated nerve fibers distributed in the human crural fascia of Thiel-embalmed cadavers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Regional changes in patellar tendon mechanical properties in vivo during non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing movements with different loads.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies·2026
Same author

The difference between subjective symptoms and objective symptom of edema during the menstrual cycle.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Teeth Clenching Improves Selective Response and Shortens Reaction Time.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same author

Potential Usefulness of Urinary Hepcidin Measurement for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Female Athletes.

European journal of sport science·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
08:55

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

Published on: February 8, 2018

9.4K

Response Inhibitory Control Varies with Different Sensory Modalities.

Koyuki Ikarashi1,2, Daisuke Sato2,3, Tomomi Fujimoto2,3

  • 1Major in Health and Welfare, Graduate School of Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|July 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Proactive inhibition, but not reactive inhibition, differs across sensory modalities. Auditory and somatosensory cues enhance proactive inhibition compared to visual cues, impacting attentional resources.

Keywords:
event-related potentialsproactive inhibitionreactive inhibitionsensory modality

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
08:55

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

Published on: February 8, 2018

9.4K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Response inhibition is crucial for daily life, involving proactive (postponing responses) and reactive (stopping movements) types.
  • Sensory modalities influence inhibition, but differences between proactive and reactive inhibition across visual, auditory, and somatosensory inputs are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare proactive and reactive inhibition across visual, auditory, and somatosensory modalities.
  • To investigate the neural processing differences associated with modality-specific inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Choice Reaction Task (CRT) and Stop-Signal Task (SST).
  • Compared proactive and reactive inhibition performance across visual, auditory, and somatosensory stimuli.
  • Analyzed Go signal-locked event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically P3 amplitudes.

Main Results:

  • Proactive inhibition was significantly higher in auditory and somatosensory modalities compared to visual.
  • Reactive inhibition did not show significant differences across modalities.
  • Auditory and somatosensory modalities exhibited decreased P3 amplitudes in SST compared to CRT, suggesting reduced attentional resources for response execution.

Conclusions:

  • Proactive inhibition is modality-dependent, with auditory and somatosensory inputs facilitating it more than visual input.
  • Reactive inhibition appears to be modality-independent.
  • Neural findings suggest modality-specific modulation of attentional resources during proactive inhibition.