Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
The association between birth by caesarean section at term and offspring cognitive and academic performance: A birth
Julie A Blake1,2,3, Anita Pelecanos4, Jake M Najman3
1Child and Youth Mental Health Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Insights
Caesarean section (CS) birth does not impact offspring cognitive or academic performance. This study found no significant long-term differences in cognitive abilities or academic achievement between children born via CS and those born vaginally.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Caesarean section (CS) is linked to adverse maternal and offspring health outcomes.
- Previous research on CS and offspring cognitive/academic performance is inconsistent and limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cognitive and academic performance in offspring delivered via CS versus vaginal birth.
- Assess performance in childhood and early adulthood.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal birth cohort study of 4327 mother-offspring pairs.
- Cognitive assessment using PPVT-R (ages 5, 21) and Raven's matrices (age 14).
- Academic achievement measured by WRAT (age 14).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant association between birth mode and cognitive performance at age five (P=0.11).
- Elective CS showed a small, non-significant deficit (-2.2) in PPVT-R scores at age five.
- No cognitive or academic performance differences observed at ages 14 and 21.
Conclusions:
- Birth mode is not significantly associated with offspring cognitive or academic performance.
- This study refutes concerns of CS negatively impacting cognitive development.
Background:
Caesarean section (CS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes for both mothers and offspring. The evidence for an association between CS and reduced offspring cognitive and academic performance has been inconsistent, with considerable limitations.
Aim:
The aim of this study is to compare cognitive and academic performance in childhood and early adulthood in offspring delivered by CS with those delivered vaginally at term.
Materials And Methods:
Data on 4327 mothers and offspring from a longitudinal birth cohort study were analysed. Offspring cognitive performance was measured by the Picture Peabody Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) at ages five and 21 and the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices at age 14. Academic achievement was assessed using the Wide Range Achievement Test at age 14.
Results:
After adjustment for confounding factors, there was no statistically significant association between cognitive performance and offspring birth mode at age five (P = 0.11). The adjusted difference of mean scores at five years on the PPVT-R for elective CS birth compared to those born by vaginal delivery was -2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to -0.2), whereas for emergency CS it was 0.0 (95% CI -2.0 to 2.0). There were no differences in cognitive or academic performance at ages 14 and 21.
Conclusion:
Birth mode was not significantly associated with offspring cognitive or academic performance. Our study does not support concerns that CS is associated with a reduction in cognitive performance.
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Language and Cognition
Regression Toward the Mean
Biological Influences on Intelligence
The Nativist Approach

