Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Using routinely recorded data in a UK RCT: a comparison to standard prospective data collection methods
G A Powell1, L J Bonnett2,3, C T Smith2
1Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Sciences Centre, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UK. gpowell@liv.ac.uk.
Routinely recorded health data has significant limitations in accuracy and completeness for identifying epilepsy patients and assessing clinical outcomes in trials. Further research is needed to determine its optimal use alongside standard data collection methods.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Health Informatics
- Epilepsy Research
Background:
- Electronic health records (EHRs) offer potential for informing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- However, accessing and ensuring the accuracy of routinely recorded data presents challenges.
- The Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial in the UK serves as a case study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the attributes and agreement of routinely recorded data against case report forms (CRFs) in an epilepsy RCT.
- To evaluate data quality for participant identification, baseline, and follow-up in the SANAD II trial.
- To compare routinely collected data with data gathered via CRFs in an antiepileptic drug trial.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the SANAD II trial, a pragmatic, UK multicenter RCT on antiepileptic drugs.
- Extracted routinely recorded secondary care data from NHS Digital Hospital Episode Statistics and primary/secondary care data from The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank.
- Assessed data attributes (missingness) and agreement using Cohen's kappa for categorical data and Bland-Altman plots for continuous data.
Main Results:
- Significant missing data (15/20 variables) was found in routine records, including all clinical variables.
- Poor agreement was observed for seizure occurrence and adverse events; only 37% of participants had a date of first seizure recorded.
- Satisfactory agreement was noted for antiepileptic drug prescription dates and healthcare resource use episodes.
Conclusions:
- Current limitations in routinely recorded data hinder its use for participant identification and clinical outcome assessment in epilepsy RCTs.
- Further research is essential to evaluate the attributes, agreement, benefits, and cost-effectiveness of routinely recorded data.
- The optimal integration of routinely recorded data with standard CRF methods requires further investigation for epilepsy and other chronic conditions.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blind Procedures
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...