Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

05:57
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
Published on: January 6, 2023
3.1K
Superior gluteal artery injury risk from third sacral segment transsacral screw insertion
Jonathan G Eastman1, Quintin A Kuse2, Milton L Chip Routt3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA. jgeastman@gmail.com.
Summary
The S3 transsacral (TS) screw pathway for pelvic injury stabilization is distant from the superior gluteal artery (SGA), posing minimal risk. The S2 TS pathway is closer to the SGA, potentially increasing injury risk.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Anatomy
- Radiology
Background:
- Pelvic ring injuries often require stabilization with iliosacral (IS) or transsacral (TS) screws.
- The superior gluteal artery (SGA) runs near common screw insertion paths.
- The S3 segment offers a potential osseous fixation pathway (OFP), but its proximity to the SGA is uncharacterized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the anatomical relationship between the superior gluteal artery (SGA) and potential screw insertion paths in the sacrum.
- To determine the safety of using the third sacral segment (S3) as an osseous fixation pathway (OFP) for transsacral (TS) screws.
Main Methods:
- Fifty pelvic CT angiograms (CTA) from uninjured patients were analyzed.
- Screw starting points for S1 IS/TS, S2 TS, and S3 TS screws were identified.
- Distances from screw paths to the SGA were measured on 3D CTA reconstructions.
Main Results:
- The average distance from S1 IS screws to the SGA was 23.0 ± 7.9 mm.
- The average distance from S2 TS screws to the SGA was 14.3 ± 6.4 mm.
- The average distance from S3 TS screws to the SGA was 25.9 ± 6.5 mm.
- No S1 or S3 TS screw paths, but 10% of S2 TS paths, were projected to be within 3.5 mm of the SGA, indicating potential injury risk.
Conclusions:
- The S3 TS screw pathway is anatomically remote from the SGA, suggesting a safe option for pelvic stabilization.
- The S1 IS and S3 TS pathways offer greater distance from the SGA compared to the S2 TS pathway.
- The S2 TS pathway presents a theoretically higher risk of SGA injury in patients with an available S3 OFP.

