[Separation and identification of impurities from intermediates of istradefylline]

Istradefylline is a novel selective adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist that is used to treat Parkinson's disease and improve motor dysfunction in the early stage of this disease. During the synthesis of intermediate A1 (6-amino-1,3-diethyl-2,4-(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione), at least two by-products were formed under alkaline or high-temperature conditions. In a previous study, one of the by-products in the synthesis of the intermediate was studied, and its structure was identified as (E)-N-ethyl-2-cyano-3-ethylamino-2-butene amide. In this study, we used high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to analyze another impurity formed during the synthesis of A1, and the following steps were executed: 0.4 g of intermediate was weighed and added to a 50 mL beaker, followed by the sequential addition of 8 mL water and 8 mL acetonitrile, and then, ultrasonic dissolution was performed. Finally, the solution was filtered through a 0.45-μm organic membrane and the test sample solution was obtained. We used the Agilent zorbax C18 chromatography column, with acetonitrile (A)/water(B) as the mobile phase under gradient elution ((t_min/A∶B)=t₀/20∶80, t₁₅/60∶40, t₂₀-t₅₀/90∶10). The detector wavelength is 268 nm. In order to separate the impurity from A1, we used a Ceres B preparative column, with acetonitrile-water (30/70, v/v) as the mobile phase. The flow rate was set at 30 mL/min, and the detection wavelength was 268 nm. The structure of the impurity was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), one-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (2D NMR), and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). In MS experiments, an electrospray ionization (ESI) source was used with positive ion scanning. In the NMR experiments, we used tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard and deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d₆) as the solvent to obtain the spectra. The results of preparative high performance liquid chromatography (Prep-HPLC) showed that good separation effect could be achieved by isocratic elution, and the impurity was perfectly separated. The¹H-NMR spectral data are as follows:¹H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO): δ 1.01 (q, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (q, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 3.04 (p, J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.74 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 5.85 (s, 1H). The ¹³C-NMR spectral data are summarized as follows: ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO): δ13.9, 14.1, 15.9, 34.6, 34.9, 36.9, 81.9, 152.2, 153.3, 159.3, 162.0. The impurity was characterized by single-crystal XRD, and its spatial structure was further verified and determined as 1-(1,3-diethyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-ethylurea. Based on the chemical structure of the impurity, we propose the following mechanism for the impurity: when A1 is synthesized under alkaline conditions or at high temperature, excessive diethylurea continues to undergo amidation with A1 to obtain this by-product. Although the formation mechanism of the impurity studied in this paper is different from that of the intermediate A1 impurity (E)-N-ethyl-2-cyano-3-ethylamino-2-butene amide, both the impurities are formed at high temperatures. Both will be accompanied by A1 in the subsequent reaction of istradefylline synthesis. The relationship between drug impurities and drug safety is a complex relationship that is affected by many factors. Generally, most impurities in drugs have potential biological activities, and some even interact with the drugs, thus affecting their efficacy and safety and inducing toxic effects. Therefore, to ensure the quality of istradefylline, it is necessary to control the impurity content during the production. The findings of this paper may provide guidelines for controlling the impurity content in istradefylline.