Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures
Published on: October 3, 2016
Federal Out-of-Network Balance Billing Legislation: Context and Implications for Radiology Practices
Richard E Heller1, Ed Gaines1, Naveen Parti1
1From the Departments of Communications and Health Policy and Pediatric Radiology, Radiology Partners, 2330 Utah Ave, Suite 200, El Segundo, CA 90245 (R.E.H.); Department of Regulatory Affairs, Zotec Partners, Greensboro, NC (E.G.); Department of Radiology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC (N.P.); Department of Radiology, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC (N.P.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322 (R.D.).
The No Surprises Act protects patients from surprise medical bills by limiting out-of-pocket costs. This new law uses arbitration to resolve payment disputes between insurers and physicians, aiming to preserve network contracting.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Medical Economics
- Patient Advocacy
Background:
- Out-of-network (OON) balance billing, or surprise billing, results in significant patient costs when care is received from out-of-network providers.
- Federal legislation to end surprise billing faced challenges due to potential impacts on insurer-physician negotiations and in-network rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the implications of the No Surprises Act, a federal law designed to eliminate surprise medical billing.
- To examine how the new legislation affects patient costs, insurer-physician negotiations, and network contracting.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the No Surprises Act's legislative framework and its arbitration-based approach to OON reimbursement disputes.
- Review of the potential impact on radiology practices and the role of ongoing rulemaking and stakeholder advocacy.
Main Results:
- The No Surprises Act shields patients from surprise billing by capping their out-of-pocket expenses at in-network cost-sharing levels.
- The law aims to maintain good-faith negotiations between physicians and insurers and encourage network participation.
Conclusions:
- The No Surprises Act represents a significant patient protection measure, removing patients from OON reimbursement conflicts.
- Ongoing regulatory processes and continued physician advocacy are vital for the effective implementation and evolution of the law.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

