Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
Longer-Term Impact of the Flavored Tobacco Restriction in Two Massachusetts Communities: A Mixed-Methods Study
Melody Kingsley1, Claude M Setodji2, Joseph D Pane2
1Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Introduction:
In response to high rates of youth tobacco use, many states and localities are considering regulations on flavored tobacco products. The purpose of this study was to assess whether flavored tobacco restrictions (FTRs) in Massachusetts curb youth tobacco use over time and whether a dose-response effect of length of policy implementation on tobacco-related outcomes exists.
Aims And Methods:
Using a quasiexperimental design, two municipalities with a FTR (adopting municipalities) were matched to a comparison municipality without a FTR. Surveys were administered before (December 2015) and after (January and February 2018) policy implementation to high school students in these municipalities (more than 2000 surveys completed at both timepoints). At follow-up, adopting municipalities had a policy in place for 1 and 2 years, respectively. In 2019, focus groups were conducted with high school students in each municipality.
Results:
Increases seen in current tobacco use from baseline to follow-up were significantly smaller in adopting municipalities compared to the comparison (-9.4% [-14.2%, -4.6%] and -6.3% [-10.8%, -1.8%], respectively). However, policy impact was greater in one adopting municipality despite shorter length of implementation. Focus groups indicated reasons for differential impact, including proximity to localities without FTRs.
Conclusions:
Restrictions implemented in adopting municipalities had positive impacts on youth tobacco awareness and use 1-2 years postimplementation. Policy impact varies depending on remaining points of access to flavored tobacco, as such policy effectiveness may increase as more localities restrict these products.
Implications:
In response to high rates of youth flavored tobacco use (including flavored vape products), federal, state, and localities have passed FTRs that reduce availability of flavored tobacco in youth-accessible stores. Previous research has found that FTRs may curb youth tobacco use in the short-term; however, the long-term effectiveness remains unknown.This is the first study to show FTRs can curb youth tobacco use and reduce youth awareness of tobacco prices and brands even 2 years after policy passage. Municipality-specific factors, including proximity to localities without FTRs, may attenuate policy impact, highlighting the importance of widespread policy adoption.
More Related Videos
10:44Examination of Rapid Dopamine Dynamics with Fast Scan Cyclic Voltammetry During Intra-oral Tastant Administration in Awake Rats
Published on: August 12, 2015
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Longitudinal Research
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...