Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some methodological problems in the assessment of complementary therapy.

H M Anthony1

  • 1University Department of Immunology, General Infirmary, Leeds, U.K.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Archives of disease in childhood·1999
Same author

Mortality associated with oral contraceptive use. Medical profession needs to examine facts.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
Same author

Management of hyperactive inattentive children.

Lancet (London, England)·1998
Same author

Fetal growth and coronary heart disease.

Lancet (London, England)·1997
Same author

Food intolerance.

Lancet (London, England)·1994
Same author

Psychology of multiple allergies.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1993

Assessing complementary therapy efficacy requires new scientific methods. Traditional trials are often unsuitable for individualized, mind-body focused treatments, necessitating alternative approaches for reliable evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Integrative Medicine
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Growing public and medical interest in complementary therapies necessitates efficacy assessment.
  • Current popularity suggests effectiveness, but objective data is lacking.
  • Rigorous scientific evaluation is crucial for validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the urgent need for proper efficacy assessment of complementary therapies.
  • To explore challenges in applying standard clinical trial designs to complementary medicine.
  • To suggest alternative methodologies for evaluating these treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Examination of limitations in standard double-blind randomized controlled trials for complementary therapies.
  • Discussion of challenges posed by individualized treatment and patient engagement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of the role of body-mind interactions and the placebo effect in complementary medicine.

    • Main Results:

    • Standard trial designs are often inapplicable to complementary therapies due to their individualized nature.
    • The 'placebo effect' and patient engagement are integral aspects needing investigation.
    • Conventional trials may not adequately capture patient-reported outcomes or subjective experiences.

    Conclusions:

    • Alternative scientific assessment methods are needed for complementary therapies.
    • The challenges in trial design may extend beyond complementary medicine.
    • Further research into novel methodologies is essential for evidence-based integration.