Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Standard prophylactic versus intermediate dose enoxaparin in adults with severe COVID-19: A multi-center, open-label,
Usha S Perepu1, Isaac Chambers1, Abdul Wahab1
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Insights
For severe COVID-19 patients, intermediate-dose enoxaparin did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or thrombosis compared to standard prophylactic doses. Both treatments showed similar efficacy and safety profiles in this hospitalized group.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often experience coagulopathy.
- Optimal prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for COVID-19 remains uncertain and may vary with disease severity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 receiving standard prophylactic versus intermediate-dose enoxaparin.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different enoxaparin dosing strategies in severe COVID-19.
Main Methods:
- A multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
- 176 hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 were randomized 1:1 to standard prophylactic or intermediate weight-adjusted dose enoxaparin.
- Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included thromboembolism and major bleeding.
Main Results:
- 30-day all-cause mortality was 15% for intermediate dose and 21% for standard dose enoxaparin (P=0.31).
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between the groups (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.33-1.37).
- Arterial or venous thrombosis occurred in 13% of the intermediate-dose group and 9% of the standard-dose group; major bleeding occurred in 2% of each group.
Conclusions:
- Standard prophylactic and intermediate doses of enoxaparin did not significantly differ in preventing death or thrombosis in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 at 30 days.
- The findings suggest that intermediate-dose enoxaparin offers no significant advantage over standard prophylactic dosing in this patient population.
Background:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with coagulopathy but the optimal prophylactic anticoagulation therapy remains uncertain and may depend on COVID-19 severity.
Objective:
To compare outcomes in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 treated with standard prophylactic versus intermediate dose enoxaparin.
Methods:
We conducted a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing standard prophylactic dose versus intermediate dose enoxaparin in adults who were hospitalized with COVID-19 and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or had laboratory evidence of coagulopathy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard prophylactic dose enoxaparin or intermediate weight-adjusted dose enoxaparin. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included arterial or venous thromboembolism and major bleeding.
Results:
A total of 176 patients (99 males and 77 females) underwent randomization. In the intention-to-treat population, all-cause mortality at 30 days was 15% for intermediate dose enoxaparin and 21% for standard prophylactic dose enoxaparin (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.45; P = .31 by Chi-square test). Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated no significant difference in mortality between intermediate and standard dose enoxaparin (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.37; P = .28). Arterial or venous thrombosis occurred in 13% of patients assigned to intermediate dose enoxaparin and 9% of patients assigned to standard dose enoxaparin. Major bleeding occurred in 2% of patients in each arm.
Conclusion:
In hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19, standard prophylactic dose and intermediate dose enoxaparin did not differ significantly in preventing death or thrombosis at 30 days.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care