Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Integration of quantitative absolute myocardial blood flow estimates from dynamic CZT-SPECT improves the detection of
Fang-Shin Liu1,2, Shan-Ying Wang1,3, Yu-Chien Shiau1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banciao Dist., New Taipei City, 220, Taiwan.
Insights
Dynamic cardiac SPECT improves detection of multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements were more effective than myocardial flow reserve (MFR) for diagnosing CAD severity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presents diagnostic challenges with traditional semiquantitative single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
- Dynamic cardiac SPECT offers quantitative assessments of stenosis severity and ischemic burden through myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the added diagnostic value of dynamic SPECT imaging in patients with multi-vessel CAD.
- To compare the performance of dynamic SPECT quantitative parameters against traditional semiquantitative metrics.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients with suspected CAD undergoing dynamic ECG-gated dipyridamole MPI and coronary angiography.
- Comparison of semiquantitative scores (SSS, SRS, SDS) with quantitative MBF (MBFs, MBFr) and MFR at patient and vessel levels.
Main Results:
- Globally increased SSS and impaired MBFs were associated with significant CAD at the patient level.
- Regional MBFs reductions correlated significantly with stenotic vessels, with optimal cutoff values identified for predicting CAD.
- Absolute post-stress MBFs demonstrated superior performance compared to MFR and semiquantitative parameters in detecting significant CAD.
Conclusions:
- Dynamic CZT-SPECT provides a validated method for quantifying MFR and MBF.
- This quantitative approach enhances the detectability of multi-vessel CAD.
- Absolute MBFs is a more effective parameter than MFR for diagnosing CAD severity in this context.
Background:
Balanced ischemia with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is difficult to diagnose with semiquantitative single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Dynamic cardiac SPECT provides quantitative estimations of stenosis severity and ischemic burden by assessing myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and myocardial blood flow (MBF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incremental value of dynamic SPECT in multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods:
Patients with suspected CAD who underwent dynamic ECG-gated dipyridamole MPI and coronary angiography within 6 months were retrospectively reviewed. The performance of summed stress, rest and difference scores (SSS, SRS, SDS), post-stress and resting MBF (MBFs, MBFr) and MFR were compared at both patient level and vessel level.
Results:
In 32 patients with 39 stenotic vessels, 12 had three-vessel disease (38%). Globally increased SSS and impaired MBF values were significantly associated with significant CAD at the patient level, but SDS and MFR were not. Regional increases in SSS and reductions in both MBFs and MBFr were significantly associated with stenotic vessels. The best cutoff value of global MBFs to predict CAD was 3.5 ml·g-1·min-1 (area under the curve, AUC = .84, P = .002). The best cutoff value of regional MBFs to detect significant stenosis was 3.6 ml·g-1·min-1 (AUC = .74, P < .001). However, the best possible cut-off values of MFR were not found. Sex-difference in both global and regional MBFr but MBFs was found, which might result in the non-significance in MFR.
Conclusions:
This study validated a clinically available method to quantify MFR using dynamic CZT-SPECT. This method improved the detectability of multi-vessel CAD, and absolute MBFs was superior to MFR and other semiquantitative MPI parameters.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT