Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale
Published on: April 19, 2021
Model protein excited states: MRCI calculations with large active spaces vs CC2 method
Valérie Brenner1, Thibaut Véry1, Michael W Schmidt2
1LIDYL, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Researchers benchmarked advanced computational methods for modeling protein excited states. Generalized active space self-consistent field (GASSCF) and occupation-restricted multiple active space (ORMAS) schemes efficiently reduced complexity without losing accuracy for large systems.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurately calculating excited states in protein models is crucial for understanding their function.
- The standard complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method struggles with large systems due to computational cost.
- Developing efficient alternatives to CASSCF is essential for studying larger, more complex molecular systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark alternative computational methods for excited states in phenylalanine protein models.
- To assess methods that reduce computational cost while maintaining accuracy compared to CASSCF.
- To evaluate the performance of generalized active space self-consistent field (GASSCF), occupation-restricted multiple active space (ORMAS), and coupled cluster (CC2) methods for larger systems.
Main Methods:
- Benchmarking calculations on excited states of phenylalanine protein models.
- Comparison of CASSCF with reduced-determinant strategies: restricted active space self-consistent field, GASSCF, and ORMAS.
- Inclusion of dynamic correlation using complete active space second-order perturbation theory and multireference difference dedicated configuration interaction.
- Assessment of approximate second-order coupled cluster (CC2) for larger systems.
Main Results:
- GASSCF and ORMAS schemes efficiently reduce the configuration interaction expansion without sacrificing accuracy for singlet ππ* and nπ*CO excited states.
- These methods maintain the accuracy of excitation energies and the nature of excited states compared to CASSCF.
- The CC2 method demonstrates accurate performance for large systems, comparable to more computationally intensive methods.
Conclusions:
- GASSCF and ORMAS are highly efficient strategies for extending accurate excited-state calculations beyond the CASSCF limit.
- Guidelines for optimal application of these schemes to large systems are proposed.
- The CC2 method shows significant potential for accurately treating excited states in very large molecular systems.
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Models
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Molecular Orbital Theory I

