Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Plastic Behavior01:21

Plastic Behavior

332
A material's elastic behavior is characterized by the disappearance of stress once the load is removed, allowing the material to return to its original state. However, when stress surpasses the yield point, yielding commences, marking the onset of plastic deformation or permanent set. This change from elastic to plastic behavior is influenced by the peak stress value and the duration before the load is removed. An intriguing observation occurs when a specimen is loaded, unloaded, and...
332
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress01:25

Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress

271
In designing structural elements and machine parts using ductile materials, it is crucial to ensure that these components withstand applied stresses without yielding. Yielding is initially determined through a tensile test, which evaluates the material's response to uniaxial stress. However, tensile stress is insufficient when components face biaxial or plane stress conditions This condition requires advanced criteria to predict failure.
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
271
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials01:24

Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials

1.2K
The stress-strain relationship in ductile materials such as structural steel or aluminium is intricate and progresses through several stages. When a specimen is loaded, it initially exhibits a linear length increase, depicted by a steep straight line on the stress-strain diagram. It indicates the material is elastically deforming and will return to its original shape once unloaded. However, when a critical stress value is reached, plastic deformation begins. This stage sees substantial...
1.2K
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity01:21

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity

3.4K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
3.4K
Molecular and Ionic Solids02:54

Molecular and Ionic Solids

18.7K
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
18.7K
Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

16.2K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
16.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microphase Separation Controls the Dynamics of Associative Vitrimers.

ACS macro letters·2025
Same author

Yielding behaviour of active particles in bulk and in confinement.

Nature physics·2025
Same author

Aneesur Rahman: Pioneer of molecular simulation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Rouse mode analysis of chain relaxation in reversibly crosslinked polymer melts.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2025
Same author

Computer simulations of entropic cohesion in reversibly crosslinked polymers.

Soft matter·2024
Same author

Dependence of the Glass Transition and Jamming Densities on Spatial Dimension.

Physical review letters·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

13.1K

Models for the Yielding Behavior of Amorphous Solids.

Srikanth Sastry1

  • 1Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur Campus, Bengaluru 560064, India.

Physical Review Letters
|July 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how amorphous solids deform under cyclic loading and how their yielding behavior changes with increasing annealing. The researchers developed models that capture the transition from continuous to discontinuous yielding observed in simulations. The findings suggest that structural reorganization occurs above a threshold degree of annealing, leading to a distinct mechanical response. The study highlights the importance of considering cyclic deformation effects in models of amorphous solid mechanics. The results provide a framework for understanding the complex behavior of these materials and suggest that future work should focus on validating these models with experimental data.

Keywords:
Amorphous solid mechanicsPlastic deformation modelsYielding transitionCyclic deformation theory

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.7K
Determining the Mechanical Strength of Ultra-Fine-Grained Metals
05:04

Determining the Mechanical Strength of Ultra-Fine-Grained Metals

Published on: November 22, 2021

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

13.1K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.7K
Determining the Mechanical Strength of Ultra-Fine-Grained Metals
05:04

Determining the Mechanical Strength of Ultra-Fine-Grained Metals

Published on: November 22, 2021

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Materials science modeling
  • Amorphous solid mechanics
  • Plastic deformation theory

Background:

Plastic deformation in amorphous solids is a complex phenomenon influenced by structural disorder and thermal history. Prior research has shown that the mechanical response of these materials depends strongly on their preparation and thermal treatment. However, the transition in yielding behavior with increasing annealing remains poorly understood. Most theoretical models assume uniform deformation, neglecting the effects of cyclic loading. This gap motivated the need for new approaches that can capture the discontinuous nature of yielding observed in experiments. No prior work had resolved how cyclic deformation affects the structural evolution of amorphous solids. Existing studies often overlook the role of energy thresholds in determining material response. This uncertainty drove the development of models that incorporate athermal cyclic deformation. The goal is to better understand the mechanisms behind the observed discontinuous yielding behavior.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to investigate the yielding behavior of amorphous solids under athermal cyclic deformation. The focus is on understanding how the degree of annealing influences the transition from continuous to discontinuous yielding. The researchers propose to explore models that can reproduce features observed in simulations. The motivation stems from the lack of theoretical frameworks that account for cyclic deformation effects. The study addresses the need to interpret the presence of a threshold energy in amorphous solids. The authors suggest that this threshold may be linked to structural reorganization during deformation. The study seeks to bridge the gap between theoretical predictions and experimental observations. The ultimate goal is to provide a mechanistic explanation for the discontinuous yielding behavior seen in amorphous solids.

Main Methods:

The study employs a family of models to simulate the yielding behavior of amorphous solids. These models incorporate athermal cyclic deformation as a key variable. The approach focuses on capturing the structural evolution of the material during deformation. The researchers use computational simulations to explore the effects of varying annealing conditions. The models are designed to reproduce features observed in prior simulations of amorphous solids. The study emphasizes the role of energy thresholds in determining material response. The researchers analyze the transition from continuous to discontinuous yielding as annealing increases. The models are validated by comparing their predictions with known simulation results.

Main Results:

The strongest finding is that the yielding behavior of amorphous solids changes qualitatively above a threshold degree of annealing. The models reproduce the discontinuous nature of yielding observed in simulations. The presence of a threshold energy is interpreted as a structural reorganization event. The study shows that cyclic deformation leads to distinct mechanical responses compared to uniform deformation. The models capture the transition from continuous to discontinuous yielding with increasing annealing. The results suggest that the threshold energy is linked to the material's structural state. The simulations reveal that athermal cyclic deformation plays a critical role in determining material behavior. The findings provide a framework for understanding the complex yielding behavior of amorphous solids.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the transition in yielding behavior is linked to structural reorganization in amorphous solids. The study suggests that cyclic deformation reveals features not captured by uniform deformation models. The presence of a threshold energy is interpreted as a structural transition point. The models provide a framework for understanding the discontinuous yielding behavior observed in simulations. The findings support the idea that annealing influences the mechanical response of amorphous solids. The study highlights the need for models that incorporate cyclic deformation effects. The authors suggest that future work should focus on validating these models with experimental data. The conclusions emphasize the importance of considering structural evolution in amorphous solid mechanics.

The study suggests that structural reorganization occurs above a threshold degree of annealing, leading to discontinuous yielding.

These models reproduce key features observed in simulations and capture the effects of cyclic loading on material response.

The threshold energy is interpreted as a structural transition point that determines the material's mechanical response.

Annealing influences the structural state of the material, leading to a qualitative change in yielding behavior above a threshold.

The models incorporate athermal cyclic deformation, revealing features not captured by uniform deformation theories.

The findings suggest that structural evolution must be considered in models of amorphous solid mechanics.