Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
Published on: August 28, 2021
Boys' visuospatial abilities compensate for their relatively poor in-class attentive behavior in learning mathematics
David C Geary1, Mary K Hoard1, Lara Nugent1
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Boys’ visuospatial skills may compensate for lower classroom attention in math, but not reading. This study examined achievement, attention, and cognitive abilities in adolescents.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Classroom attention is crucial for academic achievement.
- Sex differences exist in academic performance and cognitive abilities.
- Understanding factors influencing these differences is vital for educational interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between in-class attentive behavior, cognitive abilities (intelligence, working memory, spatial abilities), and academic achievement in mathematics and reading among adolescents.
- To explore potential sex differences in attention, cognitive abilities, and their impact on achievement.
- To determine if visuospatial advantages mediate sex differences in academic achievement, considering attentive behavior.
Main Methods:
- Assessed mathematics and reading achievement, intelligence, working memory, and spatial abilities in 322 adolescents (grades 7-8).
- Collected teacher reports on students' in-class attentive behavior.
- Employed statistical analyses to examine predictors of achievement and mediation effects.
Main Results:
- In-class attentive behavior predicted achievement in both mathematics and reading, with a stronger effect for mathematics.
- Boys exhibited lower attentive behavior than girls and achieved higher in mathematics than expected based on their engagement.
- Boys' superior visuospatial skills fully mediated the sex difference in mathematics achievement, but not in reading achievement, after controlling for attentive behavior.
Conclusions:
- Visuospatial skill advantages in boys may compensate for lower classroom engagement in mathematics learning.
- This compensatory effect was not observed for reading competencies, suggesting domain-specific influences.
- Findings highlight the complex interplay of cognitive abilities, attention, and sex on academic achievement.
More Related Videos
06:57Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies