Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Social Facilitation

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.

Social Scripts

People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Towards the complexity of laugh communication in great apes: exact facial replications in laugh faces of orangutans and chimpanzees.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Validity of the Polar H10 for Continuous Measures of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Synchrony Analysis.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Local specialists' experience and skills in animal behaviour studies: insights from wild chimpanzee field assistants.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Assessing flexibility in meaning and context in non-human communication.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025

Same author

Social and individual factors mediate chimpanzee vocal ontogeny.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

The motivation to inform others: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees.

PeerJ·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

Action co-representation under threat: A Social Simon study.

Morgan Beaurenaut¹, Guillaume Dezecache², Julie Grèzes¹

¹Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles - INSERM U960, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, PSL Research University, INSERM, Paris, France.

|July 11, 2021

Summary

Danger does not hinder social interaction. Co-representation, crucial for cooperation, is maintained even under threat and can increase when one partner feels safe, contrary to popular belief.

Keywords:

Anxiety Co-representation Joint Simon effect Social buffering Threat

More Related Videos

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Social Neuroscience

Background:

Individuals automatically integrate others' actions for coordination.
The effect of danger perception on this social mechanism is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how perceived danger impacts the capacity for co-representation.
To determine if threat reduces or enhances social interaction mechanisms.

Main Methods:

Two groups performed the Social Simon task, measuring co-representation.
Participants completed the task during 'threat' and 'safety' blocks.
Threat blocks involved potential aversive stimuli; safety blocks did not.

Main Results:

Co-representation was preserved during danger.
Co-representation increased when participants faced threat alone but with a safe partner.
Danger perception did not inhibit social interaction capacities.

Conclusions:

The cognitive mechanism of co-representation is resilient to perceived danger.
Social cooperation abilities can be enhanced under specific threat conditions.
Contrary to expectations, danger does not necessarily impair social interaction.