Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.3K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.3K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.6K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.6K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

397
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
397

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research progress on detection technologies for Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2026
Same author

Optimizing the mucosal frontier: longevity and epithelial barriers in prime-boost mRNA vaccine strategies.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Development of a Machine Learning‑Based Prognostic Model for Intermediate Trophoblastic Tumors: A Single-Center Study With Web-Based Tool Implementation.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Color vision.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same author

Temporal dynamics of adaptation to same- and other-race faces: buildup, decay and sustained effects.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

HIF-1α impairs NK cell differentiation-maturation and cytotoxicity in myelodysplastic syndrome via JAK1/STAT5/SOCS2 pathway.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.5K

Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Yi Gao1, Kamilla N Miller1, Michael E Rudd1

  • 1Integrative Neuroscience Program, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.

Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
|July 12, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Perception of time across vision and touch depends on presentation order and temporal context, not the sensory modality. This finding is crucial for understanding active perception and multisensory integration.

Keywords:
central tendencycrossmodalduration perceptionpresentation ordertemporal context

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.5K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory perception

Background:

  • Effective active perception relies on integrating visual and tactile information over time.
  • Coordinated timing between sensory modalities is essential for this integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how perceived duration is affected by temporal context and presentation order within and across visual and tactile modalities.
  • To determine if modality (vision vs. touch) influences duration comparison.

Main Methods:

  • A two-interval forced choice task was used to compare perceived durations.
  • Participants compared standard and variable durations presented either within the same modality (intramodal) or across modalities (crossmodal).
  • Presentation order (standard first or comparison first) and temporal context (shorter vs. longer standard durations) were manipulated.

Main Results:

  • Longer standard durations were overestimated when presented second (comparison-standard) and underestimated when presented first (standard-comparison).
  • Shorter standard durations showed unbiased estimation.
  • Temporal context influenced duration estimation (e.g., 1000 ms estimation varied based on whether it was the longer or shorter standard).
  • Discrimination performance was better for standard-first trials, supporting the Type B effect across both intramodal and crossmodal conditions.
  • Results were consistent regardless of whether visual or tactile stimuli defined the duration.

Conclusions:

  • Duration comparison between vision and touch is influenced by presentation order and temporal context.
  • Modality does not play a significant role in crossmodal or intramodal duration perception.
  • Findings contribute to understanding multisensory integration and temporal perception.