Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025
Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
A Tale of Two Cities: Applying the Boston Syncope Criteria to Jerusalem
Osama Muhtaseb1, Evan Avraham Alpert1, Shamai A Grossman2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Insights
The Boston Syncope Criteria effectively identify low-risk syncope patients for discharge in Israeli emergency departments, demonstrating 99% negative predictive value for adverse outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Decision Rules
- Cardiology
Background:
- Syncope is a frequent cause of emergency department visits, posing diagnostic challenges for physicians.
- Existing decision rules, like the Boston Syncope Criteria, aim to guide management but require validation across diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the validity and applicability of the Boston Syncope Criteria in an Israeli emergency department population.
- To determine if the criteria can reliably differentiate high-risk from low-risk syncope patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 198 patients diagnosed with syncope at a tertiary hospital in Jerusalem.
- Application of the Boston Syncope Criteria to identify patients at high risk for adverse outcomes or critical interventions.
- Thirty-day follow-up utilizing a national health system database.
Main Results:
- The Boston Syncope Criteria demonstrated a high sensitivity (95%) and negative predictive value (99%) in identifying patients with adverse outcomes.
- The criteria correctly classified 20 out of 21 patients who experienced an adverse outcome or critical intervention.
- Specificity was 66%, indicating potential for over-admission of low-risk patients.
Conclusions:
- The Boston Syncope Criteria appear to be a useful tool for emergency physicians in Israel for safely discharging low-risk syncope patients.
- The findings suggest the criteria's potential utility in international settings for managing syncope patients.
Background:
Syncope is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits; however, the decision to admit or discharge patients after a syncopal episode remains challenging for emergency physicians. Decision rules such as the Boston Syncope Criteria have been developed in an attempt to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients as well as those who can be safely discharged, but applying these rules to different populations remains unclear.
Objectives:
To determine whether the Boston Syncope Criteria are valid for emergency department patients in Israel.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort convenience sample included patients who visited a tertiary care hospital in Jerusalem from August 2018 to July 2019 with a primary diagnosis of syncope. Thirty-day follow-up was performed using a national health system database. The Boston Syncope Criteria were retrospectively applied to each patient to determine whether they were at high risk for an adverse outcome or critical intervention, versus low risk and could be discharged.
Results:
A total of 198 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed follow-up. Of these, 21 patients had either an adverse outcome or critical intervention. The rule detected 20/21 with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 66%, and a negative predictive value of 99.
Conclusions:
The Boston Syncope Criteria may be useful for physicians in other locations throughout the world to discharge low-risk syncope patients as well as identify those at risk of complications.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Measurement of Blood Pressure
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
01:30Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
01:23Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
01:10Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
01:22Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever: