Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa
Published on: August 30, 2018
A quantitative assessment of the indirect impacts of human-elephant conflict
Christie Sampson1,2, S L Rodriguez1,2, Peter Leimgruber2
1Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Abstract:
Human-wildlife conflict has direct and indirect consequences for human communities. Understanding how both types of conflict affect communities is crucial to developing comprehensive and sustainable mitigation strategies. We conducted an interview survey of 381 participants in two rural areas in Myanmar where communities were exposed to human-elephant conflict (HEC). In addition to documenting and quantifying the types of direct and indirect impacts experienced by participants, we evaluated how HEC influences people's attitudes towards elephant conservation. We found that 99% of participants suffered from some type of indirect impact from HEC, including fear for personal and family safety from elephants and fear that elephants will destroy their home. Despite experiencing moderate levels of indirect impacts from HEC at the community level, participants expressed attitudes consistent with supporting future elephant conservation programs.
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
Threats to Biodiversity
Migration
Ecological Disturbance
Limits to Natural Selection
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

