Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
Published on: March 31, 2016
Differential Excitability of PV and SST Neurons Results in Distinct Functional Roles in Inhibition Stabilization of
Juan L Romero-Sosa1,2, Helen Motanis1,3, Dean V Buonomano4,2
1Department of Neurobiology, Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Abstract:
Up states are the best studied example of an emergent neural dynamic regime. Computational models based on a single class of inhibitory neurons indicate that Up states reflect bistable dynamic systems in which positive feedback is stabilized by strong inhibition and predict a paradoxical effect in which increased drive to inhibitory neurons results in decreased inhibitory activity. To date, however, computational models have not incorporated empirically defined properties of parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SST) neurons. Here we first experimentally characterized the frequency-current (F-I) curves of pyramidal (Pyr), PV, and SST neurons from mice of either sex, and confirmed a sharp difference between the threshold and slopes of PV and SST neurons. The empirically defined F-I curves were incorporated into a three-population computational model that simulated the empirically derived firing rates of pyramidal, PV, and SST neurons. Simulations revealed that the intrinsic properties were sufficient to predict that PV neurons are primarily responsible for generating the nontrivial fixed points representing Up states. Simulations and analytical methods demonstrated that while the paradoxical effect is not obligatory in a model with two classes of inhibitory neurons, it is present in most regimes. Finally, experimental tests validated predictions of the model that the Pyr ↔ PV inhibitory loop is stronger than the Pyr ↔ SST loop.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Many cortical computations, such as working memory, rely on the local recurrent excitatory connections that define cortical circuit motifs. Up states are among the best studied examples of neural dynamic regimes that rely on recurrent excitatory excitation. However, this positive feedback must be held in check by inhibition. To address the relative contribution of PV and SST neurons, we characterized the intrinsic input-output differences between these classes of inhibitory neurons and, using experimental and theoretical methods, show that the higher threshold and gain of PV leads to a dominant role in network stabilization.
Related Concept Videos
The Role of Ion Channels in Neuronal Computation
Sometimes a single EPSP is strong enough to induce an action potential in the postsynaptic neuron. However, multiple presynaptic inputs must often create EPSPs around the same time for the postsynaptic neuron to be sufficiently depolarized to fire an action potential....
Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)
There are two types of receptors: ionotropic and metabotropic.
The ionotropic receptor is the membrane protein that has an...
Integration of Synaptic Events
Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Neurotransmitters
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Action Potential: Phases of Stimulation
Resting Phase:
In this phase, the cell's membrane is at its resting potential, typically around -70 millivolts (mV) for neurons. Inside the cell, there is a higher concentration of potassium ions (K+) and a lower concentration of sodium ions (Na+). Voltage-gated sodium channels are closed, and...

