Laparoscopic and open surgery methods in managing surgical intussusceptions: A randomized clinical trial of

Masoud Jamshidi1, Bahman Rahimi2, Neda Gilani3

  • 1Pediatric Surgery Ward, Tabriz Medical Sciences' University, Tabriz, Iran.

Insights

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) for intussusception in infants is a valuable screening tool, potentially reducing open surgery (OS) rates. This approach demonstrated a lower postoperative complication rate compared to traditional open surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Intussusception is a common surgical emergency in infants.
  • Traditional open surgery (OS) for intussusception carries risks of postoperative complications.
  • Laparoscopic surgery (LS) offers a minimally invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the postoperative complications of laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) in infant patients with intussusception.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of LS as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in surgical intussusception.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind, randomized clinical trial involving 52 infants (6-24 months) with intussusception.
  • Patients were assigned to either LS (laparoscopic observation, hydrostatic enema, mechanical reduction) or OS (conventional technique).
  • Follow-up was conducted for 2 years to compare postoperative complications.

Main Results:

  • The laparoscopic surgery group had a lower postoperative complication rate (P ≤ 0.021).
  • While operating time was longer in the LS group (P ≤ 0.006), fewer patients required bowel resections compared to OS.
  • The conversion rate from LS to OS was 31%.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopy serves as an effective screening tool to identify the need for open surgery in intussusception cases.
  • Implementing LS can decrease the overall incidence of open surgery and associated complications in pediatric intussusception.
Abstract