The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture
Marek Jastrzębski1, Haran Burri2, Grzegorz Kiełbasa1
1First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Insights
The V6-V1 interpeak interval effectively differentiates between selective and non-selective left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, offering a new diagnostic tool for LBB capture. This ECG measurement helps distinguish pacing types for improved patient management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing is a crucial technique for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
- Differentiating between selective LBB, non-selective LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing is essential for optimizing pacing strategies.
- Current methods for distinguishing these pacing types can be complex and may not always be definitive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of the V6-V1 interpeak interval in differentiating between selective (s-LBB), non-selective (ns-LBB), and left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing.
- To determine if R-wave peak times (RWPT) in V1 and V6 correlate with different LBB area capture patterns.
- To establish the V6-V1 interpeak interval as a novel diagnostic criterion for LBB area capture.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) from 124 patients with confirmed LBB capture.
- Comparison of V6-V1 interpeak interval, V6RWPT, and V1RWPT across different LBB capture types (s-LBB, ns-LBB, LVS).
- Statistical analysis including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine optimal cut-off values.
Main Results:
- Loss of LVS capture increased V1RWPT (≥15 ms) without affecting V6RWPT.
- Loss of LBB capture increased V6RWPT (≥15 ms) with minimal impact on V1RWPT.
- The V6-V1 interval was longest in s-LBB (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate in ns-LBB (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest in LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms).
- An optimal V6-V1 interval of 33 ms differentiated ns-LBB from LVS capture (AUC 84.7%).
- A cut-off of >44 ms achieved 100% specificity for diagnosing LBB capture.
Conclusions:
- The V6-V1 interpeak interval is a valuable and promising new criterion for diagnosing left bundle branch area capture.
- This ECG-derived measurement can reliably distinguish between different types of LBB pacing.
- The V6-V1 interval offers a simpler and potentially more accurate method for assessing LBB capture efficacy.
Aims:
We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V1 and V6. Consequently, the V6-V1 interpeak interval could differentiate the three types of LBB area capture: non-selective (ns-)LBB, selective (s-)LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS).
Methods And Results:
Patients with unquestionable evidence of LBB capture were included. The V6-V1 interpeak interval, V6RWPT, and V1RWPT were compared between different types of LBB area capture. A total of 468 patients from two centres were screened, with 124 patients (239 electrocardiograms) included in the analysis. Loss of LVS capture resulted in an increase in V1RWPT by ≥15 ms but did not impact V6RWPT. Loss of LBB capture resulted in an increase in V6RWPT by ≥15 ms but only minimally influenced V1RWPT. Consequently, the V6-V1 interval was longest during s-LBB capture (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate during ns-LBB capture (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest during LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms). The optimal value of the V6-V1 interval value for the differentiation between ns-LBB and LVS capture was 33 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84.7%). A specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of LBB capture was obtained with a cut-off value of >44 ms.
Conclusion:
The V6-V1 interpeak interval is a promising novel criterion for the diagnosis of LBB area capture.
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction


