Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection
Yuya Taguchi1, Shunsuke Kubo2, Akihiro Ikuta2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan. yuya_handball_13@yahoo.co.jp.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) can be life-saving. Patients not requiring VA-ECMO support survived after PCI and aortic repair.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Left main coronary artery (LMCA) malperfusion is a rare but serious complication of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD).
- Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LMCA malperfusion due to AAAD are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI for LMCA malperfusion caused by AAAD.
- To evaluate the efficacy of PCI and subsequent surgical repair in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of nine consecutive patients undergoing PCI for LMCA malperfusion caused by AAAD (1995-2020).
- Assessment of patient demographics, clinical presentation, interventions (PCI, intra-aortic balloon pumping, VA-ECMO), and outcomes.
- Evaluation of PCI success (TIMI grade 2 or 3) and survival at 5-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Eight patients presented with cardiogenic shock, and five with cardiopulmonary arrest.
- Successful PCI was achieved in eight patients.
- Five patients who underwent successful PCI and aortic repair survived at 5 years; four patients requiring VA-ECMO support died during hospitalization.
Conclusions:
- LMCA malperfusion in AAAD can mimic acute coronary syndrome clinically.
- PCI followed by surgical aortic repair offers a survival benefit for AAAD patients with LMCA malperfusion who do not require VA-ECMO support.
Abstract:
The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) malperfusion caused by acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) remains largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI for LMCA malperfusion caused by AAAD. We examined nine consecutive patients undergoing PCI for LMCA malperfusion caused by AAAD between 1995 and 2020. The mean age was 55.4 ± 7.7 years. Eight patients presented cardiogenic shock, and five patients cardiopulmonary arrest. Two patients were diagnosed with AAAD before coronary angiography using computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography, respectively, and in the other seven patients after coronary angiography using other modalities. Four patients underwent PCI on intra-aortic balloon pumping support, and four patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support, including one patient on both. PCI was successful in eight patients, with final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 2 or 3. The four patients on VA-ECMO did not undergo aortic dissection repair due to poor recovery of cardiac function and died during the hospital stay, and the other five patients had successful PCI, underwent aortic dissection repair, and remained alive at 5 year follow-up. In conclusion, LMCA malperfusion caused by AAAD seemed to have clinical presentations and electrocardiogram changes similar to acute coronary syndrome. PCI and subsequent surgical aortic repair saved the lives of all AAAD patients with LMCA malperfusion who had not required VA-ECMO.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care


