Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

05:58
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
4.3K
Analytical Performance and Comparability of Three New Coagulation Analyzers
Clinical Laboratory
|July 14, 2021
Summary
Three new coagulation analyzers show excellent analytical performance but exhibit variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and D-dimer tests. Differences in reference ranges may explain observed variabilities in coagulation parameter testing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diagnostic Technology
Background:
- Evaluating analytical performance is crucial before adopting new coagulation analyzers in clinical laboratories.
- This study assessed three new analyzers: STA-R Max3, CN-6000, and Cobas t511.
- Key coagulation parameters evaluated include prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, and D-dimer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the analytical performance of three new coagulation analyzers.
- To compare their performance for PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer.
- To assess their correlation with a currently used analyzer (STA-R Compact).
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 427 plasma samples (fresh and frozen/thawed).
- Evaluated precision, carryover, linearity, auto-dilution, and reference ranges per CLSI guidelines.
- Compared results with STA-R Compact and among the new analyzers, including samples with hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (H/I/L).
Main Results:
- All analyzers demonstrated excellent performance within manufacturer targets for precision, carryover, linearity, auto-dilution, and reference range.
- Good correlation (Pearson's r: 0.84–1.00) was observed for PT, aPTT, and fibrinogen with STA-R Compact, but D-dimer showed weaker correlation.
- Weaker correlations and higher bias were noted for aPTT and D-dimer with total samples, and for all parameters with normal vs. abnormal samples. Differences were more pronounced with H/I/L samples.
Conclusions:
- The three new coagulation analyzers exhibit excellent analytical performance.
- Good correlations were found, but significant variability exists for aPTT and D-dimer results.
- Variability is likely due to differing reference and reportable ranges across analyzers.

