Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An analysis of basicranial axis form.

C Lavelle1

  • 1Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Canada.

Anatomischer Anzeiger
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term outcomes for patients with peritoneal acellular mucinosis secondary to low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2020
Same author

Exploring the perceived medical ethics and law training needs of UK foundation doctors.

Medical teacher·2019
Same author

Association between psychological distress and cancer type in patients referred to a psycho-oncology service.

Irish medical journal·2017
Same author

LENS: A New Pulsed Neutron Source for Research and Education.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016
Same author

Hospital infection society prevalence survey of Healthcare Associated Infection 2006: comparison of results between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

The Journal of hospital infection·2008
Same author

Whither screening for oral cancer?

Oral oncology·2007
Same journal

Comparative quantitative ultrastructural studies of the choroidal epithelium of hydrocephalic (hpy/hpy) and normal mice, and the effect of stress induced by water deprivation.

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
Same journal

[The vena emissaria mastoidea and its possible connection to the cells of the mastoid apophysis].

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
Same journal

Arising patterns of the bovine diaphragmatic crura.

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
Same journal

The fine structure of the camel prostate gland.

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
Same journal

Effects of hydrocortisone acetate treatment on the small intestine of the lactent marsupial Didelphis albiventris.

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
Same journal

[Anatomical observations of the coronary artery vascularization in the guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus, L.)].

Anatomischer Anzeiger·1991
See all related articles

Basicranial form analysis revealed minor differences between microcephalic, macrocephalic, and normocephalic groups. Differences varied by analysis method, requiring further study for cephalometric reference plane validity.

Area of Science:

  • Craniometry
  • Anthropology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Basicranial form is crucial for understanding skull development and variation.
  • Cephalometric analysis relies on standardized reference planes.
  • Previous studies have not fully explored basicranial form in relation to neurocranial variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and compare the two-dimensional basicranial form in microcephalic, macrocephalic, and normocephalic individuals.
  • To evaluate the utility of basicranial form as a reliable reference plane in cephalometric analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized lateral cephalographs from age-sex matched samples.
  • Defined basicranial form using linear dimensions, Fourier coefficients, and medial axis lengths.
  • Compared analyses across microcephalic, macrocephalic, and normocephalic groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Observed relatively minor contrasts in basicranial form compared to the neurocranium.
  • Identified variations in contrast patterns dependent on the data analysis technique employed.
  • Highlighted the need for further investigation into basicranial form's consistency.

Conclusions:

  • Basicranial form shows limited variation across different cephalic index groups.
  • The choice of analytical method significantly impacts the observed differences in basicranial form.
  • The validity of basicranial form as a cephalometric reference plane requires additional research.