Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

35.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
35.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Conservation of Momentum: Introduction01:16

Conservation of Momentum: Introduction

15.8K
The total momentum of a system consisting of N interacting objects is constant in time or is conserved. A system must meet two requirements for its momentum to be conserved:
15.8K
Principle of Equivalence01:18

Principle of Equivalence

2.3K
According to Albert Einstein (1897-1955), free-falling and feeling weightless are intrinsically linked. If a person were in free-fall under gravity, for example, diving towards the Earth from an airplane, they would feel completely weightless. Similarly, a person descending in a lift may feel partially weightless. Broadly speaking, it is assumed that an object in a uniform gravitational field and an object undergoing constant acceleration in the absence of gravity are under the same...
2.3K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.8K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.8K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

40
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
40

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to use freedom of information request data for nursing research.

Evidence-based nursing·2026
Same author

Correspondence on "defining 'abortion'": response to Sakr.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same author

Registers and quotas: strengthening conscientious objection policy in healthcare.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same author

Reconsidering the impairment argument against abortion.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2025
Same author

Clearing the air on surgical smoke: Why National Health Service trusts must act.

Journal of perioperative practice·2025
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Not all personal utilities are equal: a two-tier normative framework for genomic health technology assessment.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Emergent ethics of xenotransplantation: findings from a survey on public attitudes toward animal to human organ transplantation in the UK.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Is sport in the 'public interest'? Towards a legal and ethical framework for justifying sport-related harm.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K

Inconsistency arguments still do not matter.

Bruce Philip Blackshaw1, Nicholas Colgrove2, Daniel Rodger3

  • 1Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK bblackshaw@gmail.com.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|July 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study refutes criticisms of inconsistency arguments against opponents of abortion (OAs). It demonstrates that OAs’ actions are generally consistent with their beliefs regarding fetal personhood and ethical obligations.

Keywords:
abortion - inducedembryos and fetusesmoral statuspersonhood

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Law
  • Moral Philosophy

Background:

  • Inconsistency arguments challenge opponents of abortion (OAs) for perceived contradictions between their beliefs and actions.
  • William Simkulet critiqued Colgrove et al.'s defense against these arguments, claiming OAs are morally negligent regarding issues like frozen embryos and poverty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rebut Simkulet's criticisms of inconsistency arguments.
  • To demonstrate that Simkulet's critique targets a narrow subset of OAs and fails even for that group.
  • To reaffirm the validity of inconsistency arguments in bioethical discourse.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation and logical analysis.
  • Critique of Simkulet's specific objections to inconsistency arguments.
  • Examination of evidence regarding OAs' actions on related ethical issues.

Main Results:

  • Simkulet's criticisms are deemed inapplicable to the majority of OAs due to his narrow focus.
  • Simkulet's responses to Colgrove et al.'s objections are found to be unconvincing.
  • Evidence indicates that OAs actively engage with issues such as frozen embryos and poverty, contrary to Simkulet's claims.

Conclusions:

  • The original arguments by Colgrove et al. against inconsistency arguments remain robust.
  • Simkulet's critique does not successfully undermine the broader application or validity of inconsistency arguments in the abortion debate.