Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Specific survival nomograms based on SEER database for small intestine adenocarcinoma
Dan Wang1, Chenglong Li2, Yuqiang Li1
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Background:
Small intestine cancers, as an extremely rare tumor type, account only for 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. Small intestine adenocarcinoma (SIA), representing approximately one-third of all small bowel cancers, has received relatively little attention, both in research efforts and clinical cognizance. Owing to anatomical proximity and rarity, small bowel adenocarcinomas are frequently grouped with colorectal adenocarcinomas. Therefore, a large SIA patient cohort is needed to develop and validate new nomogram prognostic models specific to SIA patients.
Methods:
Patients diagnosed with SIA between 2004 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Final Results (SEER) database. All patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort and the validation cohort (2:1). The basic clinical information, detailed pathological staging, and treatment information of the patients were included in the analysis. Nomograms were shaped following the evaluations of the Cox regression model and verified using the decision curve analysis (DCA), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, concordance index (C-index), and calibration curves.
Results:
The entire group comprised 6,947 patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma. According to the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis, ten variables, including marital status, age, pathological grade, tumor location, T (tumor), N (nodes), M (metastasis) stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and regional nodes examined (RNE), were independent predictors of both of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). All significant variables were used to create the nomograms for OS and CSS. Various methods verified the reliability of the nomograms. The C-indexes of the OS and CSS nomogram were 0.756 (95% CI, 0.748-0.764) and 0.771 (95% CI, 0.761-0.781) in the training cohort and 0.748 (95% CI, 0.736-0.760) and 0.767 (95% CI, 0.752-0.781) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual survival. DCA indicated a clear net benefit of these new forecasting models.
Conclusions:
This study built and verified nomograms to predict OS and CSS for rare SIA, which appear to be excellent tools to augment the clinically available evidence to facilitate the discussion between SIA patients and clinicians regarding therapeutic choice.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach