Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Gestational age and child development at school entry
Gursimran K Dhamrait1,2, Hayley Christian3,4, Melissa O'Donnell3,5
1Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. gursimran.dhamrait@telethonkids.org.au.
Insights
Children born preterm face higher risks of developmental vulnerability at school entry. Sociodemographic factors significantly influence these risks, though some vulnerability in post-term born children remains unexplained.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Gestational age at birth is linked to school readiness.
- Developmental vulnerability at school entry is a concern for public health.
- Understanding risk factors is crucial for early intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- Quantify the risk of developmental vulnerability associated with gestational age.
- Investigate the impact of sociodemographic and modifiable factors on this relationship.
- Analyze the association between gestational age and developmental vulnerability at school entry.
Main Methods:
- Linked population-level birth, hospital, and perinatal data to the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC).
- Followed a cohort of 64,810 singleton children from birth to school entry.
- Used modified Poisson Regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and risk differences (RD) for developmental vulnerability.
Main Results:
- Developmental vulnerability showed a reverse J-shaped relationship with gestational age.
- Children born extremely preterm had the highest risk of developmental vulnerability.
- Sociodemographic factors attenuated risks for most gestational age categories, except early-term births.
Conclusions:
- Children born before full-term are at increased risk for developmental vulnerabilities.
- Sociodemographic disadvantage largely explains elevated vulnerability in preterm infants.
- Vulnerability in post-term infants is less explained by sociodemographic factors compared to preterm infants.
Abstract:
Studies have reported a dose-dependent relationship between gestational age and poorer school readiness. The study objective was to quantify the risk of developmental vulnerability for children at school entry, associated with gestational age at birth and to understand the impact of sociodemographic and other modifiable risk factors on these relationships. Linkage of population-level birth registration, hospital, and perinatal datasets to the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC), enabled follow-up of a cohort of 64,810 singleton children, from birth to school entry in either 2009, 2012, or 2015. The study outcome was teacher-reported child development on the AEDC with developmental vulnerability defined as domain scores < 10th percentile of the 2009 AEDC cohort. We used modified Poisson Regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and risk differences (RD) of developmental vulnerability between; (i) preterm birth and term-born children, and (ii) across gestational age categories. Compared to term-born children, adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics attenuated RR for all preterm birth categories. Further adjustment for modifiable risk factors such as preschool attendance and reading status at home had some additional impact across all gestational age groups, except for children born extremely preterm. The RR and RD for developmental vulnerability followed a reverse J-shaped relationship with gestational age. The RR of being classified as developmentally vulnerable was highest for children born extremely preterm and lowest for children born late-term. Adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics attenuated RR and RD for all gestational age categories, except for early-term born children. Children born prior to full-term are at a greater risk for developmental vulnerabilities at school entry. Elevated developmental vulnerability was largely explained by sociodemographic disadvantage. Elevated vulnerability in children born post-term is not explained by sociodemographic disadvantage to the same extent as in children born prior to full-term.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Information Processing Approach
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...