Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Stroke Severity and Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation
Kotaro Watanabe1, Shuhei Okazaki1, Takaya Kitano1
1Department of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Insights
Stroke severity and outcomes are similar for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to those with known AF. Early detection of latent AF and anticoagulation are crucial for preventing severe strokes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant risk factor for severe stroke.
- Understanding stroke severity differences between newly diagnosed and known AF patients is crucial for risk stratification and management.
- Existing research has not sufficiently evaluated stroke severity in these distinct AF patient groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes between patients with newly diagnosed AF and those with known AF.
- To evaluate the impact of AF diagnosis timing on acute ischemic stroke characteristics.
- To inform clinical strategies for managing stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 196 acute ischemic stroke patients with AF (January 2010 - October 2019).
- Patients categorized into 'newly diagnosed AF' and 'known AF' groups.
- Stroke severity assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission; in-hospital outcomes by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge. Statistical adjustments included covariate adjustment and propensity score matching.
Main Results:
- Newly diagnosed AF patients (33%) had lower rates of male sex, prior stroke, and pre-stroke oral anticoagulation compared to known AF patients.
- No significant differences were observed in NIHSS scores on admission or mRS scores at discharge between the two groups.
- Adjusted analyses confirmed no association between newly diagnosed AF and stroke severity (NIHSS) or in-hospital outcomes (mRS).
Conclusions:
- Stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes do not significantly differ between newly diagnosed and known AF patients after accounting for relevant factors.
- The findings underscore the importance of detecting latent AF.
- Emphasizes the critical role of timely anticoagulation in preventing severe stroke, regardless of AF diagnosis timing.
Abstract:
Background and Purpose: Once a stroke occurs in a patient with atrial fibrillation (AF), it is likely to be severe. Patients with newly diagnosed AF after stroke and those with known AF before stroke have different background characteristics, yet the difference in stroke severity has not been sufficiently evaluated. In the current study, we compared the stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes between these patient groups. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a database of 196 patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF between January 2010 and October 2019. We divided the patients into two groups: patients with "newly diagnosed AF" and those with "known AF." We assessed the stroke severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission and in-hospital outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge. Results: The proportion of newly diagnosed AF was 33% (64/196). There were no differences in age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and past history of heart failure between patients with newly diagnosed AF and those with known AF. Patients with newly diagnosed AF were associated with a lower proportion of male sex (male; 50 vs. 67%, p < 0.05), a lower proportion of past history of stroke (12 vs. 35%, p < 0.01), a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (median [interquartile range]; 3 [2-4] vs. 3.5 [3-5], p < 0.01), and a lower proportion of pre-stroke oral anticoagulation (5 vs. 59%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in the NIHSS score on admission (12 [4-19] vs. 9 [3-19]) or the mRS score at discharge (3 [1-5] vs. 3 [1-5]). After adjustment for relevant covariates, newly diagnosed AF was not associated with the NIHSS score on admission [adjusted common odds ratio (OR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.60] or the mRS score at discharge (adjusted common OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.88-3.18). After propensity score matching, newly diagnosed AF was not associated with the NIHSS score on admission (adjusted common OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.48-1.73) and the mRS score at discharge (adjusted common OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.92-3.43). Conclusion: Stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed AF did not differ from those in patients with known AF after adjustment for clinically relevant factors. The importance of detection of latent AF and subsequent anticoagulation in preventing severe stroke should be further emphasized.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

