Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnosis of bacteraemia in neonatal foals using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing.

Equine veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Melatonin Impairs Glucose Tolerance, First-Phase Insulin Secretion, and Insulin Feedback Inhibition; Interaction With MTNR1B Diabetes Risk Variant.

Diabetes care·2026
Same author

Serum adipokines are useful for predicting hyperinsulinemia secondary to corticosteroid treatment in horses.

American journal of veterinary research·2026
Same author

Traumatic dentoalveolar injury, tooth wear, and periodontal disease in working and non-working dogs (2018-2022).

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Preoperative risk assessment in horses: agreement and predictive value of CHARIOT (Combined Horse Anaesthetic Risk Identification and Optimisation Tool).

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

Size of the C7-T1 articular processes is overestimated on lateral radiographs when compared to standing cone beam computed tomography.

Equine veterinary journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Mapping Metabolism: Monitoring Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Directly in Tissue
06:18

Mapping Metabolism: Monitoring Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Directly in Tissue

Published on: June 21, 2018

11.7K

Modeling Challenge Data to Quantify Endogenous Lactate Production.

Darko Stefanovski1, Pamela A Wilkins2, Raymond C Boston3

  • 1Department of Clinical Studies - New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, United States.

Frontiers in Endocrinology
|July 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated how different modeling methods impact infusion data analysis. Results indicate that the choice of modeling approach can significantly influence pharmacokinetic parameter estimations.

Keywords:
horseinfusionlactatemathematical modelmetabolismunits

More Related Videos

Measurement and Analysis of Extracellular Acid Production to Determine Glycolytic Rate
06:47

Measurement and Analysis of Extracellular Acid Production to Determine Glycolytic Rate

Published on: December 12, 2015

25.4K
Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging
11:43

Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging

Published on: December 30, 2016

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Mapping Metabolism: Monitoring Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Directly in Tissue
06:18

Mapping Metabolism: Monitoring Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Directly in Tissue

Published on: June 21, 2018

11.7K
Measurement and Analysis of Extracellular Acid Production to Determine Glycolytic Rate
06:47

Measurement and Analysis of Extracellular Acid Production to Determine Glycolytic Rate

Published on: December 12, 2015

25.4K
Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging
11:43

Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging

Published on: December 30, 2016

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • Accurate analysis of infusion data is crucial in pharmacokinetics.
  • Modeling methodology can introduce variability in study outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of different kinetic modeling approaches on infusion data analysis.
  • To determine the susceptibility of pharmacokinetic parameters to modeling methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Three kinetic modeling approaches were compared: simple, unit, and novel automated.
  • The simple approach used software defaults (mmol/L).
  • The unit and novel approaches used infusion units (e.g., mmol/kg), with the novel approach featuring automated infusion control.

Main Results:

  • Different modeling methods yielded variations in pharmacokinetic parameter estimations.
  • The novel automated approach demonstrated a distinct response pattern compared to simpler methods.

Conclusions:

  • Modeling methodology is a significant factor influencing pharmacokinetic parameter outcomes.
  • Careful selection of modeling techniques is essential for reliable infusion data interpretation.