CYR61 as a potential biomarker for the preoperative identification of muscle-invasive bladder cancers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025
3-D Cell Culture System for Studying Invasion and Evaluating Therapeutics in Bladder Cancer
Published on: September 13, 2018
Huang Chen1, Yu Liu1, Chuanzhen Cao2
1State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background:
The biological behaviors, clinical treatment, prognosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) and muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs) are distinct. Accurate staging is pivotal in optimal therapy planning for bladder cancers (BCs). However, it is insufficient for urologists in preoperative determining whether the tumor has invaded within the muscularis propria through cystoscope and imaging methods (CT or MRI). Therefore, searching for ideal biomarkers from the tumor tissues and urine is important for identifying the MIBCs preoperatively.
Methods:
Differentially expressed genes between NMIBCs and MIBCs were identified by microarray analysis and validated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemical analysis. The correlation between cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) expression and Kaplan-Meier test evaluated patients' overall survival (OS). CYR61 protein levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in preoperatively collected urine samples from BC patients. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of uric CYR61. The siRNA mediated silencing of CYR61 in bladder carcinoma cells was performed using Lipofectamine 2000. Cell migration and invasion were assessed using wound healing and transwell assay, respectively.
Results:
Differential gene expression analysis using microarray between 14 MIBCs and 16 NMIBCs human tumor samples revealed a significant increase (P<0.001) in the expression of CYR61 in MIBCs compared with NMIBCs. Higher expression of CYR61 in MIBCs was found in additional 54 tumor samples using qRT-PCR. Therefore, the overexpression of CYR61 in MIBCs could be used as a potential biomarker to distinguish between MIBCs and NMIBCs. ELISA detected elevated levels of CYR61 in the urine samples of MIBC patients (average 2.5-fold) compared with NMIBCs, with 72.7% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity to distinguish MIBCs from NMIBCs. Wound healing and transwell assays using CYR61-silenced carcinoma cells indicated the role of CYR61 in cell migration and invasion.
Conclusions:
CYR61 expression is higher in MIBCs compared with NMIBCs and can serve as a promising biomarker for the preoperative diagnosis of MIBCs with prognostic value; however, multicentric prospective validation is essential for the further evaluation of CYR61.
