Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

258
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
258
Introduction to R01:11

Introduction to R

3.0K
R is a powerful software environment for statistical computing and graphics. Originating as an implementation of the S language, developed at Bell Laboratories, R has evolved into a robust, open-source statistical software favored by statisticians and data scientists worldwide. Its comprehensive suite includes data manipulation, calculation, and graphical display capabilities, making it versatile for data analysis and visualization. Its programming language is at the core of R's...
3.0K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.1K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates...
1.1K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

246
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
246
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

5.9K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
5.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

339
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
339

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How glycemic variability trajectories impact clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with severe pneumonia: a prospective cohort study.

BMC anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for the recovery stage of septic shock: an interventional study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Retraction Note: The c-Myc-LDHA axis positively regulates aerobic glycolysis and promotes tumor progression in pancreatic cancer.

Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England)·2026
Same author

Immune Patterns Shape Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis.

Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology·2026
Same author

Cardiogenic shock revisited: From hemodynamic-centric to multimodal precision care.

Trends in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

V-A ECMO for refractory malignant arrhythmia and cardiogenic shock following acute hydrofluoric acid burns: a case report and pathophysiology review.

International journal of emergency medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Propensity score matching with R: conventional methods and new features.

Qin-Yu Zhao1, Jing-Chao Luo2, Ying Su2

  • 1College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Annals of Translational Medicine
|July 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Propensity score matching (PSM) helps reduce bias in observational studies. This tutorial provides a six-step framework and R programming guidance for applying PSM effectively in clinical research.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceR programming languageobservational studypropensity score matching (PSM)

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for treatment effect estimation but face ethical and cost limitations.
  • Observational studies offer large datasets but suffer from potential bias due to systematic differences in baseline covariates.
  • Propensity score methods, particularly propensity score matching (PSM), are valuable for reducing bias in observational studies by balancing covariates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive, step-by-step tutorial for implementing propensity score matching (PSM) using the R programming language.
  • To address limitations in existing PSM tutorials by covering a broader range of packages and practical applications.
  • To offer guidance on advanced PSM techniques, including generalized and time-dependent propensity scoring.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a six-step framework for PSM implementation.
  • Detailed guidance on R programming for each step, from data preprocessing to analysis.
  • Explanation of propensity score estimation, matching algorithms, and post-matching analysis.
  • Inclusion of generalized propensity scoring for multiple/continuous treatments and time-dependent PSM.

Main Results:

  • The tutorial offers a practical, code-driven approach to PSM, enhancing its accessibility for researchers.
  • It covers a wide spectrum of PSM applications, from basic matching to complex scenarios.
  • Recent updates and best practices in PSM are integrated into the framework.

Conclusions:

  • This tutorial serves as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to apply PSM in observational studies.
  • The R-based framework facilitates accurate and efficient estimation of treatment effects.
  • Understanding the advantages and limitations of propensity score methods is crucial for robust causal inference.