Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference between two binomial parameters for use with small samples.

S L Beal1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

Biometrics
|December 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2002
Same author

The need for mixed-effects modeling with population dichotomous data.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2001
Same author

Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2001
Same author

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of repeated measures time-to-event pharmacodynamic responses: the antiemetic effect of ondansetron.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2001
Same author

Non-steady state population kinetics of intravenous phenytoin.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·1998
Same author

Three new residual error models for population PK/PD analyses.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·1995
Same journal

Interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials for survival outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates confidence intervals for comparing two binomial populations. A new simple interval and iterative methods show improved performance over traditional approaches for estimating differences between binomial parameters.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Comparing proportions from two independent binomial populations is a common statistical task.
  • Accurate confidence intervals are crucial for reliable inference on the difference between these proportions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of various asymptotically-based confidence intervals for the difference between two binomial parameters.
  • To compare the actual confidence level and interval length of existing and novel interval methods.

Main Methods:

  • Description and evaluation of several asymptotically-based confidence intervals.
  • Comparative analysis focusing on confidence level and interval width.
  • Assessment of a new simple interval and iteratively computed intervals.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The performance of five confidence intervals, including a standard simple interval, was assessed.
  • A newly proposed simple interval demonstrated superior performance compared to the usual interval.
  • Iteratively computed intervals also exhibited better behavior than the standard method.

Conclusions:

  • The newly developed simple confidence interval offers a more reliable alternative for estimating the difference between binomial parameters.
  • Iterative interval computation methods also provide enhanced accuracy in statistical comparisons.
  • Traditional simple intervals may be less reliable for practical applications in binomial data analysis.