Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Hemodynamic Support
Nauman Khalid1, Cheng Zhang1, Corey Shea1
1Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Unprotected left main percutaneous coronary interventions (ULMPCI) without intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support showed similar outcomes to those with IABP. Unsupported ULMPCI also resulted in shorter hospital stays, suggesting a need for further randomized trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Hemodynamic support, such as intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), is frequently used during unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
- However, evidence from randomized studies supporting routine IABP use in ULMPCI is lacking, and device-related complications are a concern.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical, procedural, and cardiovascular outcomes of ULMPCI performed with and without elective intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of unsupported ULMPCI versus IABP-supported ULMPCI.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, retrospective analysis of 217 patients undergoing non-emergent ULMPCI between 2003 and 2018.
- Patients were divided into two groups: those who received elective IABP support (n=55) and those who did not (n=162).
- Comparison of procedural success, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, major complications, and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay.
Main Results:
- Procedural success rates were high in both groups (99% with IABP, 95.3% without IABP; p=0.089).
- In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were similar between the IABP and No-IABP groups (5.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.977).
- Rates of major complications were comparable, although the IABP group experienced longer hospital and ICU stays. Bailout IABP was needed in 10% of the No-IABP group.
Conclusions:
- Unprotected left main percutaneous coronary interventions (ULMPCI) performed without intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support were not associated with increased mortality or major adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with IABP.
- Unsupported ULMPCI was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay.
- A randomized trial is warranted to definitively identify patient subgroups who may benefit from hemodynamic support during ULMPCI.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care