Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orchestrating gameplay in Dutch physical education: how and why teachers regulate task difficulty.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Enforcing a high success percentage interferes with reward-based motor learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

How prior motor states can shape perceptual decision bias: Insights from sensorimotor beta oscillations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

The role of feedback for sensorimotor decisions under risk.

Journal of vision·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K

A nearby distractor does not influence hand movements.

Kiki Arkesteijn1, Mieke Donk2, Artem V Belopolsky2

  • 1Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior
|July 17, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Manual and eye movements may share target selection processes. This study found hand movements are not biased by distractors, unlike eye movements, suggesting independent selection mechanisms.

Keywords:
AccuracyAveragingHand movementMotor planSelection

More Related Videos

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.3K
Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
07:06

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

836

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.3K
Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
07:06

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

836

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Eye movements often precede manual actions, suggesting coupled target selection processes.
  • The global effect demonstrates distractor bias in eye movements, decreasing with viewing time.
  • Investigating this effect in hand movements can clarify the coupling of motor and visual systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if hand movements exhibit a distractor bias similar to eye movements.
  • To test the hypothesis of coupled target selection mechanisms for hand and eye movements.
  • To assess the influence of viewing time on distractor effects in goal-directed hand movements.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted the classic global effect paradigm for goal-directed hand movements.
  • Presented visual targets with nearby distractors to participants.
  • Measured hand movement endpoints and analyzed bias across varying viewing times.

Main Results:

  • Hand movement endpoints showed no significant bias towards distractors for most participants.
  • The global effect observed in eye movements was largely absent in hand movements.
  • Viewing time did not influence the degree of distractor bias in hand movements.

Conclusions:

  • Target selection processes for hand movements appear to operate independently from those for eye movements.
  • The findings challenge the notion of tightly coupled target selection across different motor systems.
  • Suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlying visual guidance for manual actions versus saccadic eye movements.