Debris production in bovine bone during implant site preparation. A comparative in vitro study: ultrasonic and...

The aim of this study was to compare the size and shape of bone fragments produced by the ultrasonic and drilling procedures in implant site preparation. Six pieces of rib selected as experimental animal model of 15 cm in length and at least 13 mm of thickness were used. The samples were treated and divided into 2 groups as follows: group A (GA) ultrasonic implant site preparation technique; group B (GB) traditional surgical drill technique. Ultrasonic implant site preparation (GA) was carried out using a sequence of progressive diameter (1.00 mm, 2.00 mm and 3.00 mm) conical inserts at a depth of 10 mm. Standard drill implant site procedure (GB) was carried out with a sequence of 1.00 mm, 2.00 mm, and 3.00 mm cylindrical twist drills, for preparing an implant site at a depth of 10 mm. From each group bone fragments (0.1 gr) were collected from both cortical and cancellous bone preparation and their dimensions were evaluated by optic microscope analysis. The bone debris dimensions procured by cortical bone of Group A and Group B were, respectively, 0.14×0.16 mm (±0.13) and 1.15 ×0.92 mm (±0.68). The bone debris dimensions procured by cancellous bone of Group A and Group B were, respectively, 0.15×0.10 mm (±0.10) and 1.98×1.27 mm (±0.94). Ultrasonic implant site preparation technique was able to micronize bone and to remove all debris with cooling system. Surgical drills tend to fracture bone, creating a weaker structure and fragments of larger size, which remain in considerable quantity over bone walls during site preparation. Within the limits of the present study, the ultrasonic implant preparation was able to produce reduced bone sediments and a clear bed implant favoring osseointegration.