There's nothing plain about projection radiography! A discussion paper
B R Mussmann1, M Hardy2, J Jensen3
1Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Radiography (London, England : 1995)
|July 20, 2021
Summary
Projection radiography, including computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR), is an overlooked specialist field. Re-evaluating its complex role and terminology can enhance its prestige and educational offerings for better patient care.
Area of Science:
- Radiologic Technology
- Medical Imaging Education
Background:
- Computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) adoption requires specialized radiographer skills, yet this is often overlooked.
- Projection radiography is frequently misperceived as a simple, entry-level skill, potentially leading to professional apathy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elevate projection radiography from a basic skill to a recognized specialist imaging field.
- To advocate for a re-evaluation of the language and terminology used to describe projection radiography and its practitioners.
Main Methods:
- This study is a narrative review examining the perception and educational status of projection radiography.
- Analysis of Danish radiography curricula and student thesis topics (2016-2020) to assess focus on projection radiography versus cross-sectional imaging.
Main Results:
- Danish radiography curricula offer minimal coverage of projection radiography.
- Only 11.8% of Danish radiography student theses focused on projection radiography, compared to 41.7% on CT and MRI.
Conclusions:
- Re-framing projection radiography as a complex, specialist field is crucial for restoring its prestige.
- A shift in professional language and improved educational programs are needed to reflect the true complexity of projection radiography for enhanced patient care.
