Screening for Problematic Sleep in a Diverse Sample of Infants

Sarah M Honaker1, Maureen E McQuillan1, Jodi A Mindell2,3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine.

Insights

Screening infants for sleep problems depends on the strategy used. Night waking items effectively identify infants with issues, while sleep difficulty items better identify those without. The best approach depends on clinical goals.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Sleep Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Problematic infant sleep affects development and family well-being.
  • Effective screening tools are crucial for early identification and intervention in primary care settings.
  • Diverse infant populations present unique challenges for sleep assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying problematic infant sleep.
  • To compare the performance of various screening items against a validated measure (Infant Sleep Questionnaire).
  • To analyze the prevalence and demographic correlates of problematic sleep in a diverse infant sample.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 3,271 infants (5-19 months) in primary care completed five screening items and the Infant Sleep Questionnaire (ISQ).
  • Screening item endorsement and criterion-related validity with the ISQ were examined.
  • Prevalence, validity, and demographic associations were analyzed for conceptual composites of night waking and sleep difficulty.

Main Results:

  • Prevalence rates for problematic sleep varied significantly based on the screening item, from 7.4% (parental perception) to 74.0% (night wakings).
  • Sleep difficulty items showed high agreement (95.0-97.8%) for identifying infants *without* sleep problems but low agreement (24.9-34.0%) for those *with* problems.
  • Night waking items identified 91.0-94.6% of infants *with* sleep problems but only 31.8-46.9% of those *without*.

Conclusions:

  • Screening strategies for infant sleep problems yield variable results depending on whether they focus on perceived difficulty or night wakings.
  • The choice of screening strategy should align with the specific goals of the healthcare system or clinical setting.
  • No single screening approach is universally optimal; tailored strategies are necessary for effective identification.
Abstract