Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

14.5K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
14.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-adapted chemotherapy and MRD-oriented transplant for Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2014 trial.

Blood·2025
Same author

Daratumumab-bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma: CASSIOPEIA minimal residual disease results.

Blood·2025
Same author

Low frequency of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells predicts poor survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Blood advances·2024
Same author

Prothrombin consumption as an indicator of hemorrhagic phenotype in mild platelet function disorders.

European journal of haematology·2023
Same author

Soluble CD163 predicts outcome in both chemoimmunotherapy and targeted therapy-treated mantle cell lymphoma.

Blood advances·2023
Same author

Addition of ATG to non-myeloablative peripheral blood haploidentical transplant with PTCY decreases acute GVHD rates and improves GVHD-relapse free survival.

Bone marrow transplantation·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
12:05

Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation

Published on: November 3, 2018

11.9K

Unsupervised flow cytometry analysis in hematological malignancies: A new paradigm.

Marie C Béné1,2, Francis Lacombe3, Anna Porwit4,5

  • 1Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
|July 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This review examines how advanced computer algorithms are transforming the way clinicians analyze blood cell samples. By moving away from manual, subjective methods toward automated, machine-learning-based approaches, researchers can now identify complex cell patterns in hematological cancers with greater precision and speed. The article details the technical steps required to integrate these computational tools into standard laboratory workflows, suggesting that automated diagnostic support will soon become a regular feature of clinical practice.

Keywords:
artificial intelligenceflow cytometrymachine learningunsupervised analysismachine learningsingle-cell dataclinical diagnosticsautomated gating

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells and Stromal Niche Cells
08:34

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells and Stromal Niche Cells

Published on: September 28, 2022

4.9K
Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
09:01

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up

Published on: March 26, 2018

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
12:05

Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation

Published on: November 3, 2018

11.9K
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells and Stromal Niche Cells
08:34

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells and Stromal Niche Cells

Published on: September 28, 2022

4.9K
Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
09:01

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up

Published on: March 26, 2018

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Hematology diagnostics and unsupervised flow cytometry analysis research
  • Computational biology and data science in clinical medicine

Background:

No prior work had resolved the full potential of automated data processing for clinical blood diagnostics. Researchers have long sought better ways to interpret electronic signals from suspended cells. Early methods relied heavily on manual gating, which often introduced significant human bias. This limitation hindered the consistent identification of rare cell populations in complex samples. That uncertainty drove the development of sophisticated machine learning frameworks for high-dimensional datasets. Recent advancements in hardware stability have allowed for larger, more complex marker panels. These improvements created a need for more robust computational strategies to handle massive data volumes. This gap motivated the current synthesis of automated analytical techniques for hematological applications.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to describe the general concepts and progress achieved in developing new analytical approaches for exploring high-dimensional datasets. The authors seek to address the challenges associated with interpreting complex electronic signals from hematopoietic cells. They focus on the transition toward automated, machine-learning-based solutions for clinical diagnostic environments. This review addresses the need for standardized procedures in data acquisition and preanalytical quality control. The researchers aim to provide a practical guide for integrating advanced clustering algorithms into existing laboratory software. They intend to demonstrate that these computational methods are becoming increasingly robust and stable for clinical use. The study highlights the shift from manual, subjective analysis to more objective, data-driven paradigms. The authors aim to show that the implementation of these technologies in routine hematology laboratories is now a realistic goal.

Main Methods:

The authors employ a comprehensive review approach to synthesize recent progress in single-cell data interpretation. They evaluate various computational frameworks designed to process complex electronic signals from clinical samples. The investigation focuses on the transition from traditional manual gating to automated machine learning techniques. Their review approach covers the entire pipeline from initial data acquisition to final visualization. They provide a detailed breakdown of the necessary steps for ensuring high-quality input files. The authors specifically examine the integration of clustering algorithms with commercial software platforms. This review approach emphasizes practical implementation strategies for laboratory professionals. They offer a step-by-step guide for combining specific algorithmic tools to enhance diagnostic workflows.

Main Results:

The literature indicates that automated pipelines significantly improve the identification of diverse cell subsets in complex samples. These findings show that combining clustering algorithms with existing software platforms provides a robust solution for high-dimensional data. The authors report that these methods successfully handle the massive information generated by modern mass and classical cytometry. Their review highlights that machine learning models can now detect subtle patterns previously missed by human observers. The evidence suggests that these computational tools maintain high stability across different experimental conditions. The authors note that the integration of these systems reduces the variability inherent in manual data processing. These key findings from the literature demonstrate that automated analysis is becoming increasingly reliable for clinical applications. The results confirm that the gap between research-grade software and routine diagnostic tools is closing rapidly.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that automated computational pipelines will soon transition into standard clinical laboratory settings. Their synthesis suggests that combining clustering algorithms with established software platforms enhances diagnostic accuracy. These tools offer a more objective way to characterize malignant cell populations compared to traditional manual techniques. The researchers emphasize that mastering preanalytical data quality remains a prerequisite for successful implementation. They argue that the integration of artificial intelligence will likely reduce the time required for complex diagnostic reporting. The review highlights that the distance between current research prototypes and daily clinical utility is rapidly shrinking. These findings imply that hematologists should prepare for a shift toward data-driven, automated decision support systems. Future diagnostic workflows will rely on the synergy between high-dimensional data acquisition and advanced algorithmic interpretation.

The researchers propose that combining the FlowSOM clustering algorithm with Kaluza software enables automated identification of cell subsets. This approach improves upon traditional manual gating by reducing subjective interpretation and increasing the speed of high-dimensional data processing in clinical samples.

The authors highlight the Bioconductor package FlowSOM as a key tool for clustering. This algorithm is specifically designed to organize high-dimensional single-cell data, allowing for the visualization of complex cellular relationships that are otherwise difficult to detect using standard manual analysis methods.

The authors state that rigorous preanalytical checks of data files are necessary. This technical requirement ensures that the input signals are stable and robust, which prevents artifacts from skewing the results generated by machine learning algorithms during the subsequent classification phase.

The researchers utilize high-dimensional datasets derived from mass and classical cytometry. These data types are essential for capturing the broad spectrum of markers needed to differentiate malignant cells from healthy hematopoietic populations in complex clinical samples.

The authors measure the effectiveness of these tools by their ability to delineate numerous cell subsets. This phenomenon allows for the detection of subtle shifts in hematopoiesis, providing a more granular view of disease states than older, less sensitive counting methods.

The researchers claim that these advancements will soon reach routine hematology laboratories. They suggest that the transition from research-based prototypes to standard clinical practice is imminent, potentially transforming how practitioners approach the diagnosis and monitoring of various blood-related disorders.