Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Reduced Complications after Arterial Reconnection in a Rat Model of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
Published on: November 7, 2020
The Impact of Treatment Delay on Hepatitis C Liver Transplant Outcomes
Ian A Booth1, Jacqueline E Clark1, John C LaMattina2
1Department of Pharmacy, 21668University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Insights
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) showed similar graft survival rates. Delayed HCV treatment and rejection management did not impact outcomes, but pharmacist protocols could improve future care.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Transplant Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Direct-acting antivirals have improved hepatitis C virus (HCV) outcomes in liver transplant recipients (LTRs).
- Optimal timing for HCV treatment and rejection management in LTRs remains unclear.
- The role of pharmacists in managing HCV and rejection in LTRs is understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare graft and patient survival in HCV-positive versus HCV-negative LTRs.
- To evaluate rejection rates and sustained virologic response in HCV-positive LTRs.
- To investigate the impact of delayed HCV treatment on LTR outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Single-center, retrospective cohort review.
- Matched 1:1 comparison of 92 HCV-positive LTRs with HCV-negative LTRs.
- Analysis of 1-year graft/patient survival, rejection rates, and time to HCV treatment.
Main Results:
- One-year graft and patient survival were similar between HCV-positive and HCV-negative LTRs.
- HCV-positive LTRs had higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), unaffected by pulse steroid treatment.
- Delayed HCV treatment (5.4-6.4 months post-transplant) did not impact graft or patient survival.
Conclusions:
- HCV infection does not affect 1-year graft survival in LTRs.
- Delayed HCV treatment and rejection management strategies did not negatively impact outcomes.
- Pharmacist-driven protocols could optimize the initiation of HCV treatment in LTRs.
Abstract:
Background: Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have improved outcomes in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). However, the timing of HCV treatment and approach to treating rejection have not been well described. Additionally, pharmacists' roles in these comprehensive areas have not been investigated. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cohort review compared 1-year graft and patient survival between HCV-positive and HCV-negative LTRs. Secondary endpoints included 1-year rejection rates, HCV sustained virologic response and time to HCV treatment. Results: Ninety-two HCV Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAT)-positive LTRs were matched 1:1 to HCV-seronegative LTRs. One-year graft and patient survival were similar between groups. HCV-positive LTRs were more likely to experience biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and despite treatment with pulse steroids, there was no impact on graft survival or occurrence of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH). Time to HCV treatment was 5.4-6.4 months post-transplant, with no treatment failures or impact on graft or patient survival. Conclusions: No difference was seen in graft survival at 1 year between HCV-positive and HCV-seronegative LTRs. Delayed time to treatment of HCV and treatment of rejections in the HCV-positive cohort did not impact outcomes. However, pharmacist-driven protocols could ensure more efficient initiation of HCV treatment in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Active Drug, Metabolite and Fraction of Metabolized Drug

